`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
`
`Case No. 18-cv-02621-WHO
`
`
`ORDER ON MOTION TO IMPUTE
`SERVICE
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 32
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Having fully considered the parties’ papers and arguments at the November 28, 2018
`
`hearing, and for the reasons identified in my tentative at the hearing, plaintiff’s motion to impute
`
`service to Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. through its wholly-owned subsidiary Check
`
`Point Software Technologies, Inc. is GRANTED.
`
`Imputed service is appropriate under Cal. Corp. Code § 2110, as Inc. can be considered
`
`Ltd.’s “general manager.” The facts in this case are on all fours with those in Yamaha Motor Co.,
`
`v. Sup. Ct., 174 Cal. App. 4th 264, 267 (2009).
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: November 29, 2018
`
`
`
`
`William H. Orrick
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`