`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FIRSTFACE CO., LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:18-cv-02245-JD
`
`
`AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court sets the following amended case management deadlines pursuant to Federal
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10. The parties are advised to review and
`
`comply with the Court’s Standing Order for Civil Cases, Standing Order for Discovery in Civil
`
`Cases, and Standing Order for Civil Jury Trials.
`
`
`
`Update infringement contentions to account for new products
`
`December 10, 2021
`
`Event
`
`Deadline
`
`Supplement infringement contentions with reference to bates
`numbers for source code
`
`February 18, 2022
`
`Supplement invalidity contentions
`
`March 25, 2022
`
`Technology tutorial
`
`April 21, 2022, at 1:00 p.m.
`
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`May 5, 2022, at 1:00 p.m.
`
`Advice of Counsel
`
`Fact discovery cut-off
`
`30 days after service of
`Court’s claim construction
`Ruling
`
`August 31, 2022
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 113 Filed 12/13/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Expert disclosures
`
`Rebuttal expert disclosures
`
`Expert discovery cut-off
`
`Deadline
`
`September 30, 2022
`
`November 4, 2022
`
`November 30, 2022
`
`Last day to file dispositive and Daubert motions
`
`December 19, 2022
`
`Deadline to file responses to dispositive and Daubert motions
`
`January 31, 2023
`
`Deadline to file replies to dispositive and Daubert motions
`
`February 24, 2023
`
`Pretrial conference
`
`Jury Trial
`
`June 22, 2023, at 1:30 p.m.
`
`July 10, 2023, at 9:00 a.m.
`
`All dates set by the Court should be regarded as firm. Counsel may not modify these dates
`
`by stipulation without leave of court. Requests for continuances are disfavored, and scheduling
`
`conflicts that are created subsequent to the date of this order by any party, counsel or party-
`
`controlled expert or witness will not be considered good cause for a continuance. Sanctions may
`
`issue for a failure to follow a scheduling or other pretrial order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f)(1)(C).
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: December 13, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`JAMES DONATO
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`