`
`BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
`Maxwell V. Pritt (SBN 253155)
`mpritt@bsfllp.com
`44 Montgomery Street, 41st Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Telephone: (415) 293-6800
`Facsimile: (415) 293-6899
`
`Attorney for Non-Party Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`
`
`IN RE QUALCOMM ANTITRUST
`LITIGATION
`
`This document relates to:
`
`ALL ACTIONS
`
`
`Case No. 3:17-md-2773-JSC
`NOTICE RE: NONPARTY APPLE
`INC.’S DECISION NOT TO SEEK
`RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER
`GRANTING IN PART AND
`DENYING IN PART
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL [DKT 922] OR
`TO SUBMIT A STATEMENT IN
`SUPPORT OF QUALCOMM’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION [DKT
`938]
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE RE: APPLE INC. RECONSIDERATION OF SEALING ORDER [DKT 922] AND QUALCOMM’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
`[DKT. 938]
`Case No. 3:17-md-02773-JSC
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 3:17-md-02773-JSC Document 943 Filed 04/28/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Plaintiffs provided nonparty Apple Inc. (“Apple”) with
`select materials in connection with Plaintiffs’ opposition to Qualcomm’s motion to dismiss,
`specifically Dkt. 900-1 (Expert Report of Einer R. Elhauge) and 900-2 (Reply Expert Report of
`Einer R. Elhauge). Defendant Qualcomm Inc. (“Qualcomm”) also recently provided Apple with
`additional select materials in connection with its motion for summary judgment, specifically a
`redacted version of that motion [Dkt. 936] and portions of Exhibits 3-6 and 8 to the Declaration
`of Cody S. Harris [Dkt. 936-1]. Having reviewed those materials in light of the Court’s order
`[Dkt. 922], Apple will not seek reconsideration of the Court’s order or otherwise seek to seal any
`information identified by the parties in the select material provided to Apple by the parties as set
`forth herein.
`Apple nonetheless requests that, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), the parties
`provide clear notice to nonparties like Apple of information they have designated confidential that
`the parties intend to file, and to coordinate with nonparties to minimize sealing burdens on them
`and the Court.
`
`
`Dated: April 28, 2023
`
`BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Maxwell V. Pritt
`Maxwell V. Pritt (SBN 253155)
`mpritt@bsfllp.com
`44 Montgomery Street, 41st Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Telephone: (415) 293-6800
`Facsimile: (415) 293-6899
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`NOTICE RE: APPLE INC. RECONSIDERATION OF SEALING ORDER [DKT 922] AND QUALCOMM’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
`[DKT. 938]
`Case No. 3:17-md-02773-JSC
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site