`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`Defendant.
` /
`
`No. C 17-05659 WHA
`
`ORDER RE “STIPULATED”
`PROPOSED PROTECTIVE
`ORDER
`
`The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint submission (Dkt. No. 74), which, though
`styled as a “stipulated” proposed protective order, contains competing provisions and attorney
`argument. To the extent that the submission tees up disputes for the Court to resolve, this order
`finds no good reason to deviate from the Interim Model Protective Order under these
`circumstances and accordingly rejects Finjan’s arguments to that effect. The parties’
`“stipulated” proposed protective order will not be accepted unless and until it has been modified
`to comport with this order.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: May 10, 2018.
`
`
`WILLIAM ALSUP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`For the Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`