throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 658-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page 1 of 3
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 658-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`APPENDIX 1
`APPENDIX 1
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 658-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`Allocation Cross-Checking Worksheet
`
`Project: Initial Analysis of Asserted Patents
`
`Time
`
` Rate
`
`Amt
`
`New Alloc New Amt
`
`11/13/17
`11/26/17
`11/27/17
`11/28/17
`11/29/17
`12/01/17
`12/06/17
`
`12/11/17
`12/13/17
`
`12/14/17
`
`12/19/17
`
`RCLI
`
`12/20/17
`
`RCLI
`
`12/29/17
`
`RCLI
`
`01/05/18
`01/12/18
`
`JGLC
`RCLI
`
`01/16/18
`
`RCLI
`
`01/17/18
`
`RCLI
`
`RCLI
`JGLC
`RCLI
`
`1.70 $ 1,095
`2.50 $ 1,095
`3.70 $ 1,095
`4.60 $ 950
`4.30 $ 950
`3.50 $ 1,095
`4.30 $ 950
`
`1,862$
`
`
`2,738$
`
`4,052$
`
`4,370$
`
`4,085$
`
`3,833$
`
`4,085$
`
`3.40 $ 1,095
`4.90 $ 750
`
`3,723$
`
`
`3,675$
`
`100%
`100%
`100%
`28.6%
`28.6%
`100%
`28.6%
`
`0%
`28.6%
`
`3.70 $ 1,095
`
`
`
`4,052$
`
`28.6%
`
`3.20 $ 950
`
`
`
`3,040$
`
`4.90 $ 950
`
`
`
`4,655$
`
`50%
`
`50%
`
`3.50 $ 950
`
`
`
`3,325$
`
`100%
`
`3.80 $ 750
`3.80 $ 950
`
`2,850$
`
`
`3,610$
`
`28.6%
`50%
`
`6.40 $ 950
`
`
`
`6,080$
`
`28.6%
`
`5.10 $ 950
`
`
`
`4,845$
`
`50%
`
`2.10 $ 950
`6.50 $ 750
`2.20 $ 950
`
`1,995$
`
`
`4,875$
`
`2,090$
`
`28.6%
`28.6%
`50%
`
`1,861.50$
`
`2,738$
`
`
`4,052$
`
`1,249.82$
`
`1,168.31$
`
`3,832.50$
`
`1,168.31$
`
`-$
`
`
`
`
`1,051.05$
`
`
`
`1,158.73$
`
`
`
`1,520.00$
`
`
`
`2,327.50$
`
`3,325.00$
`
`815.10$
`
`
`
`
`1,805.00$
`
`
`
`1,738.88$
`
`2,422.50$
`
`570.57$
`
`
`1,394.25$
`
`KAGN Reviewed prior art for '780 patent
`KAGN Reviewed prior art for '494 patent
`KAGN Reviewed prior art for '494 patent
`RCLI
`Review and analysis re: invalidity issues.
`RCLI
`Review and analyze patents and prior art.
`KAGN Reviewed prior art for '494 patent
`RCLI
`Research and analyze prior art and prosecution
`history
`KAGN Reviewed '968 patent and history of patent
`JGLC
`Review Finjan asserted patents for invalidity and non-
`infringement arguments.
`KAGN Reviewed existing prior art and search strategies;
`tried to identify new search strategies
`Review and analysis re: '494 and '633 invalidity
`issues.
`Research and analysis re: invalidity arguments for
`'633 and '494 patents.
`Research and analysis re: invalidity arguments for
`'494 patent.
`Draft prior art search guidance and patent analysis
`Review and analysis re: '494 and '633 patents re:
`invalidity issues.
`Review and analysis re: Finjan patents re: invalidity
`and non-infringement issues
`Review and analysis re: '494 and '633 patents re: non-
`infringement and invalidity issues
`Fact investigation re: non-infringement arguments.
`Begin developing non-infringement theories.
`Review and analysis re: '840 and '494 invalidity
`theories.
`Review and analyze prior art re: '844 and '494 patents
`
`RCLI
`
`01/17/18
`01/18/18
`01/19/18
`
`01/23/18
`
`4.30 $ 950
`
`
`
`4,085$
`
`50%
`
`02/01/18
`
`RCLI
`
`Review and analyze pre-suit negotiation documents.
`
`1.50 $ 950
`
`
`
`1,425$
`
`28.6%
`
`02/12/18
`
`02/12/18
`
`02/13/18
`
`02/13/18
`02/15/18
`02/22/18
`
`02/22/18
`
`02/23/18
`
`03/05/18
`
`RCLI
`
`RCLI
`
`Review and analysis invalidity of '844 and '494
`patents
`Review and analysis re: non-infringement arguments
`for '494 and '844 patents.
`KWAN Review patent analysis to analyze Finjan's asserted
`patents and develop strategies for prior art searches.
`
`RCLI
`RCLI
`RCLI
`
`RCLI
`
`Research re: prior art for '633 and '494 patents.
`Prior art searching re: '633 and '494 patents.
`Review and analysis re: non-infringement arguments
`for '844, '494, and'926 patents.
`Review and analysis re: invalidity arguments for '154
`and '780 patents.
`Review and analysis re: non-infringement positions
`re: '844, '780 and '926 patents.
`KWAN Review and analyze the '494 and '844 patents for non-
`infringement and invalidity arguments
`
`RCLI
`
`4.20 $ 950
`
`
`
`3,990$
`
`3.90 $ 950
`
`
`
`3,705$
`
`50%
`
`50%
`
`1.50 $ 600
`
`
`
`900$
`
`28.6%
`
`2.40 $ 950
`4.50 $ 950
`3.40 $ 950
`
`2,280$
`
`
`4,275$
`
`3,230$
`
`2.40 $ 950
`
`
`
`2,280$
`
`4.20 $ 950
`
`
`
`3,990$
`
`1.30 $ 600
`
`
`
`780$
`
`50%
`50%
`33%
`
`50%
`
`33%
`
`50%
`
`
`
`1,045.00$
`
`
`
`2,042.50$
`
`
`
`407.55$
`
`
`
`1,995.00$
`
`
`
`1,852.50$
`
`257.40$
`
`1,140.00$
`
`
`2,137.50$
`
`
`
`1,065.90$
`
`
`
`1,140.00$
`
`
`
`1,316.70$
`
`
`
`390.00$
`
`Allocation Cross-Checking Worksheet
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`APPENDIX 1
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 658-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`03/05/18
`
`RCLI
`
`03/07/18
`
`03/09/18
`
`03/14/18
`
`JGLC
`
`03/14/18
`
`03/15/18
`
`JGLC
`
`03/19/18
`
`RCLI
`
`1.90 $ 950
`
`
`
`1,805$
`
`1.40 $ 600
`
`
`
`840$
`
`3.80 $ 600
`
`
`
`2,280$
`
`1.90 $ 750
`
`
`
`1,425$
`
`6.00 $ 600
`
`
`
`3,600$
`
`2.80 $ 750
`
`
`
`2,100$
`
`4.20 $ 950
`
`
`
`3,990$
`
`50%
`
`50%
`
`50%
`
`50%
`
`50%
`
`50%
`
`0%
`
`
`
`902.50$
`
`
`
`420.00$
`
`
`
`1,140.00$
`
`
`
`712.50$
`
`
`
`1,800.00$
`
`
`
`1,050.00$
`
`-$
`
`Review and analysis re: '844 and '494 non-
`infringement arguments.
`KWAN Review and analysis on the '844 and '494 patents to
`formulate potential non-infringement and invalidity
`arguments.
`KWAN Analyze the '494 and '844 patents to develop
`invalidity and non-infringement arguments
`Analyze potential invalidity and claim construction
`arguments for '633 and '780 Patents.
`KWAN Analyze the '844 and '494 patents for invalidity and
`non-infringement arguments
`Develop invalidity and non-infringement theories for
`the '944, '494, '633, and '780 Patents
`Review and analyze '844 claim construction orders
`from prior litigations and prosecution history re:
`assessment of non-infringement arguments.
`Call with expert S. Nielson regarding invalidity and
`non-infringement arguments for '844 and '494
`Patents.
`Development of Invalidity and non-infringement
`contentions for '844 and '494 Patent
`KWAN Analyze invalidity and non-infringement for the '844
`and '494 patents.
`Analyze '494, '844, and '926 patents for priority date.
`
`JGLC
`
`JGLC
`
`JGLC
`
`03/23/18
`
`03/23/18
`
`03/23/18
`
`04/01/18
`
`1.30 $ 750
`
`
`
`975$
`
`50%
`
`1.80 $ 750
`
`
`
`1,350$
`
`1.50 $ 600
`
`
`
`900$
`
`2.50 $ 750
`
`
`
`1,875$
`
`50%
`
`50%
`
`33%
`
`
`
`
`
`487.50$
`
`
`
`675.00$
`
`
`
`450.00$
`
`618.75$
`
`3,230.00$
`
`64.35$
`
`
`04/14/18
`04/19/18
`
`RCLI
`JGLC
`
`Review and analysis re: '780 invalidity theories.
`Analysis regarding expiration dates of patents.
`
`3.40 $ 950
`0.30 $ 750
`
`3,230$
`
`225$
`
`
`100%
`28.6%
`
`Project Total
`
`Juniper Allocation: 50%
`
`144.50
`
`
`
`129,373$
`
`50%
`
`Adjusted
`Allocation
`
`47%
`
`Adjusted Total
`
`72.25
`
`
`
`64,686$
`
`
`
`60,538.67$
`
`Allocation Cross-Checking Worksheet
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`APPENDIX 1
`Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket