`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934), brooks@fr.com
`Frank J. Albert (CA SBN 247741), albert@fr.com
`Oliver J. Richards (CA SBN 310972), ojr@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SBN 248392), courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: (612) 335-5070 / Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff, FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`FINJAN, INC.’S STATEMENT
`CONFIRMING NO OPPOSITION TO THE
`APPOINTMENT OF MATTHEW BORDEN
`AS SPECIAL MASTER
`
`
`U.S. District Judge William H. Alsup
`Courtroom 12
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`FINJAN’S NON-OPPOSITION TO APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER MATT BORDEN
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 652 Filed 01/28/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`As per the Court’s order of January 9, 2021 (D.I. 649), Finjan states that it has no objection to
`
`the appointment of Mr. Borden as special master for the parties’ dispute over attorney fees.
`
`Finjan respectfully asks that the Court’s appointment of the special master include an instruction
`
`that the special master’s report include recommended findings concerning the responsibility of Finjan’s
`
`previous counsel Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP (“Kramer Levin”) for any fees that the special
`
`master may recommend awarding. As the Court knows, Kramer Levin was Finjan’s counsel for the
`
`period in which the Court found § 285 exceptionality. Finjan’s current counsel Fish & Richardson P.C.
`
`did not represent Finjan at that time. The Court’s Order of October 22, 2020 retained jurisdiction over
`
`Kramer Levin “to entertain any motions for sanctions or further relief at the end of this action,” (D.I.
`
`631). Finjan respectfully proposes that Kramer Levin’s involvement is necessary to the fair assessment
`
`of the fee issues, particularly in view of the Attorney Eyes Only information implicated by those issues,
`
`which Finjan was unable to review under the case’s Protective Order.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 28, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Robert Courtney
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934) brooks@fr.com
`Frank J. Albert (CA SBN 247741) albert@fr.com
`Oliver J. Richards (CA SBN 310972) ojr@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Phone: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SBN 248392), courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: (612) 335-5070 / Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff FINJAN, INC.
`
`1
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`FINJAN’S NON-OPPOSITION TO APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER MATT BORDEN
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
