Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 64 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`jkagan@irell.com
`Joshua P. Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`jglucoft@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Rebecca L. Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`Kevin Wang (SBN 318024)
`kwang@irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER REGARDING AMENDING
`PROTECTIVE ORDER RELATED TO
`PRODUCTION OF THIRD PARTY
`SYMANTEC CORPORATION
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 64 Filed 04/18/18 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`By and through their respective undersigned counsel, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) and
`
`Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”) (collectively, the “Parties”), in an effort to facilitate the
`
`production of third party confidential information, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
`
`WHEREAS, Finjan filed this lawsuit against Juniper on September 29, 2017, alleging
`
`infringement of certain Finjan patents;
`
`WHEREAS, Finjan previously sued Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”) in Finjan, Inc. v.
`
`Symantec Corp., Case No. 4:14-cv-02998-HSG (N.D. Cal.) and Finjan, Inc. v. McAfee Inc. et al., 1:10-
`
`cv-00593-GMS (D. Del.), and Blue Coat Systems, Inc. (“Blue Coat”) in Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat
`
`Systems, Inc., Case No. 5:13-cv-03999-BLF and Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc., Case No.
`
`5:15-cv-003295-BLF, alleging infringement of overlapping and related patents to the Finjan patents
`
`asserted in the present action;
`
`WHEREAS, Symantec acquired Blue Coat in August 2016;
`
`WHEREAS, Juniper’s First Set of Requests for Production to Finjan requests certain
`
`documents from Finjan’s previous lawsuits that include Symantec and Blue Coat confidential
`
`information;
`
`WHEREAS, Symantec objects to Designated House Counsel accessing documents containing
`
`Symantec and Blue Coat confidential information under the “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`
`Only” designation in the Patent Local Rule 2-2 Interim Model Protective Order (“Protective Order”) or
`
`under a similar provision in a subsequent protective order;
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties agree that documents containing Symantec and Blue Coat confidential
`
`information may be designated as “Highly Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” and such
`
`documents will not be disclosed to in-house counsel;
`
`THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate to amend the Protective Order and any subsequent
`
`protective order such that documents containing Symantec and Blue Coat confidential information
`
`designated as “Highly Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” may be disclosed only to those
`
`persons with access to “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” and such documents will not be
`
`disclosed to in-house counsel, including Designated House Counsel.
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`1
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 64 Filed 04/18/18 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`Dated: April 16, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 16, 2018
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`
`
`/s/ Paul Andre
`By:
`Paul Andre
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Joshua Glucoft
`By:
`Joshua Glucoft
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)
`
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Paul Andre
` Paul Andre
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`2
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 64 Filed 04/18/18 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`Before the Court is the Parties’ Stipulation to Amend Protective Order Related to Production of
`
`PROPOSED ORDER
`
`Third Party Symantec Corporation Confidential Information.
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`DATED: ____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`___________________________
`The Honorable William Alsup
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`3
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`April 18, 2018.
`
`