Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 589 Filed 07/16/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`jkagan@irell.com
`Joshua Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`jglucoft@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Rebecca Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`Dennis Courtney (SBN 307646)
`dcourtney@irell.com
`Ingrid Petersen (SBN 313927)
`ipetersen@irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`)
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`)
`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING 35 U.S.C.
`)
`§ 287; [PROPOSED] ORDER
`)
`
`)
`)
`Hon. William H. Alsup
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`10690937
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING 35 U.S.C. § 287
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 589 Filed 07/16/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) and Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”), hereby
`stipulate as follows:
`WHEREAS, for purposes of this litigation only, Finjan admits that it must establish
`compliance with either the constructive or actual notice requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 287 in order to
`obtain damages from Cyphort or Juniper on each of the claims that will be addressed at the
`October 2019 trial;
`WHEREAS, for purpose of this litigation only, Finjan does not intend to assert that it
`complied with the constructive notice requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287, and instead intends to
`assert that it complied with the actual notice requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287;
`WHEREAS, for purposes of this litigation only, the parties agree that the damages period
`for Juniper or Cyphort’s alleged infringement for each of the claims that will be addressed at the
`October 2019 trial shall begin on the date that Finjan can establish that it provided Juniper or
`Cyphort with actual notice under § 287(a);
`NOW, THEREFORE, by and through their respective counsel of record, the parties hereby
`stipulate and agree as follows:
`• For purposes of this litigation only, the damages period for Juniper’s alleged
`infringement shall begin on the date that Finjan can establish it provided Juniper
`with actual notice under § 287(a). If Finjan is unable to establish that it provided
`Juniper with actual notice under § 287(a) before patent expiration, Finjan will not
`be entitled to damages for that patent.
`• For purposes of this litigation only, the damages period for Cyphort’s alleged
`infringement shall begin on the date that Finjan can establish it provided Cyphort
`with actual notice under § 287(a). If Finjan is unable to establish that it provided
`Cyphort with actual notice under § 287(a) before patent expiration, Finjan will not
`be entitled to damages for that patent.
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`10690937
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`STIPULATION REGARDING 35 U.S.C. § 287
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 589 Filed 07/16/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`Dated: July 12, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 12, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`By:
`
`/s/ Lisa Kobialka
`
`
` Lisa Kobialka
` Attorneys for Plaintiff
` FINJAN, INC.
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`By:
`/s/ Rebecca Carson
` Rebecca Carson
` Attorneys for Defendant
` JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`10690937
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`STIPULATION REGARDING 35 U.S.C. § 287
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 589 Filed 07/16/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that, for purposes of this
`litigation only, no damages shall be recovered by Finjan except on proof that Finjan satisfied the
`actual notice requirements of § 287(a) before patent expiration, in which event damages may be
`recovered only for infringement occurring after such notice.
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Dated: ___________________________
`
`
`
`
`Hon. William H. Alsup
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`10690937
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 35 U.S.C. § 287
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`July 16, 2019.
`
`