throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 587-1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`DECLARATION OF KRISTOPHER
`KASTENS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF
`FINJAN, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
`SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT
`CONTENTIONS
`
` Date: August 22, 2019
`Time: 8:00 a.m.
`
`Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KASTENS DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MOTION
`FOR LEAVE TO SUPP. INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
` CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 587-1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`I, Kristopher Kastens, declare:
`1.
`I am an attorney with the law firm Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, counsel of
`record for Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”). I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and can testify
`competently to those facts. I make this declaration in support of Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Motion for
`Leave to Supplement its Infringement Contentions.
`2.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Finjan’s proposed
`supplemental infringement contentions for SRX Gateways (Appendix E-1), Sky ATP (Appendix E-2),
`and ATP Appliance (Appendix E-3) products where the proposed supplements are reflected in
`redlines. Finjan provided the proposed supplemental infringement contentions to Juniper Networks,
`Inc. (“Juniper”) on June 25, 2019.
`3.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an e-mail chain between
`counsel for Finjan and counsel for Juniper dated from June 7, 2019 to July 3, 2019, regarding Finjan’s
`supplemental infringement contentions in which Finjan provided a copy of its supplemental
`infringement contentions to Juniper on June 25, 2019 as reflected in Exhibit A.
`4.
`As of today, Finjan and Juniper have not been able to meet and confer on this motion
`for leave to supplement infringement contentions.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that each
`of the above statements is true and correct. Executed on July 11, 2019, in Menlo Park, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kristopher Kastens
` Kristopher Kastens
`
`
`
`1
`KASTENS DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MOTION
`FOR LEAVE TO SUPP. INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
` CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket