Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 585 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`jkagan@irell.com
`Alan Heinrich (SBN 212782)
`aheinrich@irell.com
`Joshua Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`jglucoft@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Rebecca Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`Ingrid M. H. Petersen (SBN 313927)
`ipetersen@irell.com
`Kevin Wang (SBN 318024)
`kwang@irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`REGARDING TRIAL DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`Hon. William H. Alsup
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`REGARDING TRIAL DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`
`
`
`
` CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 585 Filed 07/11/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) and Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”), hereby
`stipulate as follows:
`WHEREAS, in accordance with the Fourth Amended Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 527),
`the deadline to serve opening expert reports is July 19, 2019 and the deadline to serve opposition
`expert reports is August 16, 2019;
`WHEREAS, The Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference in Civil Jury Cases Before
`The Honorable William Alsup (“Guidelines”) states that “[i]llustrative animations, diagrams, charts
`and models may be used on direct examination only if they were part of the expert’s report, with the
`exception of simple drawings and tabulations that plainly illustrate what is already in the report” and
`that “[b]y written stipulation, of course, all sides may relax these requirements.” (Guidelines at ¶ 15).
`WHEREAS, the parties agree that the exchange of all trial demonstratives for experts,
`including those as set forth in the Guidelines, will be deferred and instead disclosed according to the
`schedule below.
`NOW, THEREFORE, by and through their respective counsel of record, the parties hereby
`stipulate and agree as follows:
` The parties need not exchange demonstratives at the same time as the service of expert
`reports.
` Consistent with the previous Pretrial Order governing the first trial in this case, all
`demonstratives to be used during the direct examination of an expert shall be disclosed
`to the opposing party no later than 3:00 p.m. the day before the party intends to use the
`demonstrative.
` Consistent with the previous Pretrial Order governing the first trial in this case, all
`objections to expert demonstratives shall be served by 5:00 p.m. on the day that such
`demonstrative is disclosed.
` Consistent with the previous Pretrial Order governing the first trial in this case, parties
`need not disclose demonstratives that they intend to use on the cross-examination of an
`opposing expert.
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`REGARDING TRIAL DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`1
`
`
`
` CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 585 Filed 07/11/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`Dated: July 8, 2019
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 8, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ James Hannah
`James Hannah
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`
`By: /s/ Rebecca Carson
`Rebecca Carson
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
`
`
`/s/ James Hannah
`James Hannah
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`REGARDING TRIAL DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`2
`
`
`
` CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 585 Filed 07/11/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that:
` The parties need not exchange demonstratives at the same time as the service of expert
`reports.
` All demonstratives to be used during the direct examination of an expert shall be
`disclosed to the opposing party no later than 3:00 p.m. the day before the party intends
`to use the demonstrative.
` All objections to expert demonstratives shall be served by 5:00 p.m. on the day that
`such demonstrative is disclosed.
` Parties need not disclose demonstratives that they intend to use on the cross-
`examination of an opposing expert.
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Dated: ___________________________
`
`
`Hon. William H. Alsup
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`REGARDING TRIAL DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`3
`
`
`
` CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`July 11, 2019.
`
`