`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`JUNIPER NETWORK, INC., et al.,
`
`Case No. 17-cv-05659-WHA (TSH)
`
`
`ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
`SEAL
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 559
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`On June 25, 2019, Finjan filed a motion to seal in connection with a discovery letter brief,
`
`seeking to seal certain information that had been designated as confidential by Juniper. ECF No.
`
`559. On June 29, 2019, Juniper filed the Petersen Declaration in partial support of the motion to
`
`seal. ECF No. 567. The motion to seal is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. With
`
`respect to the joint discovery letter, the Petersen Declaration does not state that the redaction on
`
`page 3 merits redaction, so that redaction is disallowed. The redaction on page 4 is appropriate.
`
`With respect to Exhibits C, D and 1, Juniper’s objections to interrogatory 5 do not reveal Juniper’s
`
`pricing information and are not confidential. However, everything that comes after “Subject to
`
`these specific objections and the general objections incorporated here, Junior responds as follows,”
`
`is properly redacted.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: July 2, 2019
`
`
`THOMAS S. HIXSON
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`