Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 552 Filed 06/24/19 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA-TSH
`
`DECLARATION OF KRISTOPHER
`KASTENS IN SUPPORT OF JUNIPER
`NETWORKS, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER
`SEAL
`
`[Re: Dkt. No. 542]
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`KASTENS DECL. IN SUPPORT OF JUNIPER’S
`MOT. TO SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-05659-WHA-TSH
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 552 Filed 06/24/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`I, Kristopher Kastens, declare:
`1.
`I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
`2.
`I am an attorney at Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, counsel of record for Finjan,
`Inc. (“Finjan”). I make this declaration in support of Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.’s (“Juniper”)
`Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 542) pursuant to Civil Local Rules 79-5(d)-(e).
`3.
`I have reviewed the following documents and confirmed that they contain Finjan’s
`confidential business information designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” by
`Finjan pursuant to the stipulated protective order in this litigation.
`
`
`Identification of Documents
`
`Specific
`Portions to
`Seal
`
`Entity that
`Designated the
`Information to
`be Confidential
`Finjan
`
`Finjan
`
`Exhibit A to Juniper’s motion to compel documents
`related to Trustwave (Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s
`Objections and Responses to Defendant Juniper
`Networks, Inc.’s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-
`10))
`
`Exhibit 2 to Juniper’s motion to compel documents
`related to Trustwave (Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s
`Objections and Responses to Defendant Juniper
`Networks, Inc.’s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-
`10))
`
`Page 8:7-21
`page 11:22-27
`page 12:1-9,
`page 24:22-27
`page 25:12-19
`page 30:1- 21
`Page 8:7-21
`page 11:22-27
`page 12:1-9,
`page 24:22-27
`page 25:12-19
`page 30:1- 21
`4.
`Good cause exists to seal the documents identified above, based on their confidentiality.
`Finjan seeks to seal only those portions of documents that contain confidential information pursuant to
`the Protective Order and for which it has good cause to seal.
`5.
`Finjan seeks to seal portions of the above documents because they reveal Finjan’s
`confidential financial information and confidential licensing terms between Finjan and third party
`licensees or third parties whom Finjan has communicated with regarding its confidential licensing
`negotiations. The Ninth Circuit has established that this type of confidential business information
`“plainly falls within the definition of ‘trade secrets.’” In re Electronic Arts, Inc., 298 Fed. Appx. 568,
`569-70 (9th Cir. 2008) (district court erred by denying to seal confidential licensing terms); see also
`
`KASTENS DECL. IN SUPPORT OF JUNIPER’S
`MOT. TO SEAL
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-05659-WHA-TSH
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 552 Filed 06/24/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., No. 11-cv-01846-LHK, 2012 WL 3283478 at *7 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9,
`2012) (granting the sealing of licensing agreements because disclosure would cause “significant
`competitive harm to the licensing parties as it would provide insight into the structure of their licensing
`deals, forcing them into an uneven bargaining position in future negotiations”); Open Text S.A. v. Box,
`Inc., No. 13-cv-04910-JD, 2014 WL 7368594, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2014) (granting motion to seal
`pricing terms of license agreement). Finjan takes substantial measures within the company to maintain
`the confidentiality of terms discussed in license agreements or during its licensing negotiations, and
`prevent this type of confidential business information from being made public. If the general public
`including competitors gain access to Finjan’s confidential licensing information, Finjan will be placed at
`an unfair disadvantage in future business and licensing negotiations.
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that each of the
`above statements is true and corrected. Executed on June 24, 2019, in Menlo Park, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Kristopher Kastens
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KASTENS DECL. IN SUPPORT OF JUNIPER’S
`MOT. TO SEAL
`
`2
`
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-05659-WHA-TSH
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`