`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`JUNIPER NETWORK, INC., et al.,
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 17-cv-05659-WHA (TSH)
`
`ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
`SEAL
`Re: Dkt. No. 535
`
`On June 14, 2019 Finjan filed an administrative motion to seal Exhibit A to the joint
`
`discovery letter related to source code review tools. ECF No. 531. On June 18, 2019, Juniper
`
`filed the Declaration on Ingrid Petersen in support of the motion to seal. ECF No. 535. Paragraph
`
`8 of her declaration states in part: “Exhibit A is Juniper’s First Supplemental Response to Plaintiff
`
`Finjan, Inc.’s Second Set of Interrogatories, and it is my understanding that Juniper’s response to
`
`Interrogatory No. 5 contains pricing information for Juniper’s products, which are not released to
`
`the public or Juniper’s customers.” Id. However, Exhibit A is actually Juniper’s third
`
`supplemental response to Finjan’s second set of interrogatories, and it contains responses only to
`interrogatories 4, 6 and 9 – not 5. If Juniper wants any part of Exhibit A filed under seal, it must
`file a corrected declaration by June 20, 2019.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: June 19, 2019
`
`THOMAS S. HIXSON
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`