Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 528 Filed 06/14/19 Page 1 of 1
`
`I R E L L & M A N E L L A L L P
`
`A REGISTERED L IMITED L IAB IL IT Y L AW PARTNERSH IP
`
`INCLUD ING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
`
`1 8 0 0 A V E N U E O F T H E S T A R S , S U I T E 9 0 0
`
`8 4 0 N E W P O R T C E N T E R D R I V E , S U I T E 4 0 0
`
`L O S A N G E L E S , C A 9 0 0 6 7 - 4 2 7 6
`
`T E L E P H O N E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 7 7 - 1 0 1 0
`
`F A C S I M I L E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 0 3 - 7 1 9 9
`
`
`
`N E W P O R T B E AC H , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 6 6 0 - 6 3 2 4
`
`T E L E P H O N E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 0 9 9 1
`
`F A C S I M I L E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 5 2 0 0
`
`W E B S I T E : w w w .i r e l l . c o m
`
`W R I T E R ' S D I R E C T
`
`T E L E P H O N E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 5 2 2 2
`
`R C a r s o n @ i r e l l . c o m
`
`June 14, 2019
`
`
`
`Hon. William Alsup
`U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
`
`
`
`
`Re:
`
`Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.,
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA (N.D. Cal.)
`
`
`Dear Judge Alsup:
`
`In an effort to clarify issues and avoid enlarging motion practice before the upcoming trial,
`Juniper respectfully suggests that it would be helpful to the parties if the Court could issue its Orders
`on outstanding issues for the ’494 and ’154 Patents raised in the first and second rounds of the Court’s
`early summary judgment procedure at its earliest convenience See Dkt. No. 189 at 18-20 (Order
`finding that Claim 10 of the ’494 Patent is directed to an abstract idea under Alice Step One but
`deferring to rule on Alice Step Two); Dkt. No. 491 at 19 (Order to show cause as to why summary
`judgment should not be granted in favor of Juniper on Claim 1 of the ’154 Patent).
`
`Finjan recently confirmed that it intends to pursue Claim 10 of the ’494 Patent and Claim 1 of
`the ’154 Patent at trial. See Dkt. No. 516 (Finjan’s Notice of Claims). Accordingly, the two
`outstanding Orders regarding (1) whether Claim 10 of the ’494 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 101, and (2) whether Juniper does not infringe Claim 1 of ’154 Patent as a matter of law will both
`have a material impact on the scope of the upcoming trial, and may help avoid duplicative motion
`practice.
`
`
`
`
`
`10694531
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Rebecca Carson
`Rebecca Carson
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`