throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 1 of 6
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 2 of 6
`
`~Kastens, Kristopher
`Friday, May 17, 2019 9:16 AM
`Glucoft, Josh; ~Andre, Paul; ~Caire, Yuridia; ~Hannah, James; ~Hedvat, Shannon;
`~Kobialka, Lisa; ~Lee, Hannah; ~Lee, Michael; ~Manes, Austin; ~Martinez, Cristina;
`~Nguyen, Stephanie; ~Xu, Linjun
`Carson, Rebecca; Heinrich, Alan; Holland, Eileen; Isaac, Shawana; Kagan, Jonathan;
`Manzano, Jim; Mittleman, Harry; Petersen, Ingrid; Quarnstrom, Brian; Theilacker, Leah;
`Wang, Kevin
`RE: Confer
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Josh,
`
`Provide a list of issues that you plan to include in your letter by 2PM today so that Finjan knows what issues to respond
`to in our letter. We also do not agree to Juniper’s schedule for the exchange. We should exchange opening letters at
`10AM on Tuesday, May 20th. You are also incorrect that I didn’t quantify the burden on Ms. Bey for collecting petitions
`from other clients. As I told you in the past, she has hundreds of individual clients, thousands of individual file histories,
`and 20+ years of prosecution history that would require searching. We also disagree that your subpoena requested
`invoices that were not for the patents in suit.
`
`- Kris
`
`Kris Kastens
`Partner
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025
`T 650.752.1715 F 650.752.1815
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`From: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>
`Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 9:16 PM
`To: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Andre, Paul <PAndre@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Caire, Yuridia
`<YCaire@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hannah, James <JHannah@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hedvat, Shannon H.
`<SHedvat@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Kobialka, Lisa <LKobialka@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Hannah
`<HLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Michael H. <MHLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Manes, Austin
`<AManes@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Martinez, Cristina <CMartinez@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Nguyen, Stephanie
`<SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Xu, Linda <LXu@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>;
`Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>;
`Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian
`<BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin <kwang@irell.com>; #Juniper/Finjan
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 3 of 6
`
`[Int] <Juniper-Finjan@irell.com>
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Confer
`
`Kris,
`
`Thank you for conferring today.
`
`
`With respect to the invoices requested under RFP No. 2, your email below suggests that Juniper only requested invoices
`for the Patents-in-Suit, but that is not correct. We asked for invoices “related” to the Patents-in-Suit, where “related” was
`defined broadly. See Document Subpoena, Exhibit A, Definitions at ¶ 2. Invoices “related” to the Patents-in-Suit include
`invoices covering, for example, the ‘822 Patent, which is the claimed parent of the asserted ‘633 Patent (and is also
`expressly discussed in our counterclaims), as well as all other Finjan patents. Moreover, Juniper requested all Documents
`related to Finjan (RFP No. 27), which clearly includes invoices for work performed on Finjan patents. If you intend to
`maintain your position that Juniper did not ask for invoices for work performed on any patents other than the Patents-in-
`Suit and that is the basis for your continued refusal to produce such other invoices, please let us know immediately. We
`are happy to serve an amended document subpoena with a revised RFP No. 2 and to provide Ms. Bey with 12 more days,
`until May 28, to provide the other invoices before her deposition. Please let us know.
`
`With respect to the privilege and redaction logs, during our confer you stated that you believed that all the documents
`listed on those logs were in Ms. Bey’s possession and subsequently collected by Finjan but that you were going to check
`that and get back to us. If any of the documents on those logs were not in Ms. Bey’s possession, please identify those
`documents for us by the Court-ordered deadline for the production of Ms. Bey’s privilege log (tomorrow, May 17). We
`also understand that you will be completing your production of Ms. Bey’s privilege log by tomorrow, as ordered by the
`Court.
`
`With respect to the petitions to accept unintentionally delayed claims of priority, we understand that Ms. Bey will be
`producing all such petitions filed on behalf of Finjan, which Ms. Bey collected after performing a search of her
`records. You were unable to quantify on our call any specific burden to Ms. Bey in searching for other petitions that she
`may have filed for other clients; instead, Ms. Bey’s objection to producing any such other petitions is that they are not
`relevant. Of course, we disagree with Ms. Bey’s determination of relevance for at least the reasons explained during the
`telephonic hearing, and we urge you to reconsider your position. Please let us know if you intend to withdraw this
`improper objection.
`
`With respect to the other requests, I understand that Finjan is producing documents only discussing the Patents-in-Suit and
`contends that documents discussing anything else are irrelevant and will not be produced (or logged, if
`privileged). Again, we disagree with your overly narrowed understanding of what is “relevant,” at least because we
`alleged improprieties by Ms. Bey that extend beyond the Patents-in-Suit, including, for example, with respect to the ‘822
`Patent. Again we urge you to reconsider your position, or we will have to seek court intervention.
`
`Lastly, as discussed during our confer, we will have a proposal for your consideration on the other issues shortly.
`
`Thanks,
`Josh
`
`
`From: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 4:24 PM
`To: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>; ~Andre, Paul <pandre@kramerlevin.com>; ~Caire, Yuridia
`<ycaire@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hannah, James <jhannah@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hedvat, Shannon
`<shedvat@kramerlevin.com>; ~Kobialka, Lisa <lkobialka@kramerlevin.com>; ~Lee, Hannah <hlee@kramerlevin.com>;
`~Lee, Michael <mhlee@kramerlevin.com>; ~Manes, Austin <amanes@kramerlevin.com>; ~Martinez, Cristina
`<cmartinez@kramerlevin.com>; ~Nguyen, Stephanie <SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; ~Xu, Linjun
`<lxu@kramerlevin.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>;
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 4 of 6
`
`Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>;
`Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian
`<BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin <kwang@irell.com>
`Subject: RE: Confer
`
`Josh,
`As a quick follow-up to our call, we collected the invoices for the patents in suit because Juniper only requested invoices
`related to the patents-in-suit.
`- Kris
`
`
`
`Kris Kastens
`Partner
`
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025
`T 650.752.1715 F 650.752.1815
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`
`
`From: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 6:32 PM
`To: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Andre, Paul <PAndre@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Caire, Yuridia
`<YCaire@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hannah, James <JHannah@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hedvat, Shannon H.
`<SHedvat@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Kobialka, Lisa <LKobialka@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Hannah
`<HLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Michael H. <MHLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Manes, Austin
`<AManes@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Martinez, Cristina <CMartinez@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Nguyen, Stephanie
`<SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Xu, Linda <LXu@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>;
`Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>;
`Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian
`<BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin <kwang@irell.com>; #Juniper/Finjan
`[Int] <Juniper-Finjan@irell.com>
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Confer
`
`Kris,
`
`
`Confirmed for tomorrow at 4 pm Pacific to discuss Ms. Bey’s document subpoena. We are looking into the issues raised
`in Yuri’s email and we may be able to propose a compromise on the call tomorrow; if not, then we will follow up with
`you shortly after the call with a proposal.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Josh
`
`
`From: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 3:09 PM
`To: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>; ~Andre, Paul <pandre@kramerlevin.com>; ~Caire, Yuridia
`<ycaire@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hannah, James <jhannah@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hedvat, Shannon
`3
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 5 of 6
`
`<shedvat@kramerlevin.com>; ~Kobialka, Lisa <lkobialka@kramerlevin.com>; ~Lee, Hannah <hlee@kramerlevin.com>;
`~Lee, Michael <mhlee@kramerlevin.com>; ~Manes, Austin <amanes@kramerlevin.com>; ~Martinez, Cristina
`<cmartinez@kramerlevin.com>; ~Nguyen, Stephanie <SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; ~Xu, Linjun
`<lxu@kramerlevin.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>;
`Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>;
`Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian
`<BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin <kwang@irell.com>
`Subject: RE: Confer
`
`Josh,
`
`We are available to meet and confer tomorrow at 4PM. Please have lead trial counsel present as required under Judge
`Hixson’s standing order. We will discuss the issues raised in Yuri’s email at the same time. We are still considering your
`proposed schedule for exchanges.
`
`- Kris
`
`
`
`Kris Kastens
`Partner
`
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025
`T 650.752.1715 F 650.752.1815
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`
`
`Bio
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`
`From: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 4:56 PM
`To: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Andre, Paul <PAndre@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Caire, Yuridia
`<YCaire@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hannah, James <JHannah@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hedvat, Shannon H.
`<SHedvat@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Kobialka, Lisa
`<LKobialka@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Hannah <HLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Michael H.
`<MHLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Manes, Austin <AManes@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Martinez, Cristina
`<CMartinez@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Nguyen, Stephanie <SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Xu, Linda
`<LXu@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>;
`Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>; Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>;
`Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>; Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid
`<ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian <BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang,
`Kevin <kwang@irell.com>; #Juniper/Finjan [Int] <Juniper-Finjan@irell.com>
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] Confer
`
`Kris,
`Please provide a time this week that you can confer regarding Ms. Bey’s document subpoena.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 6 of 6
`
`Relatedly, Juniper proposes the following procedure for the joint submission related to Ms. Bey’s deposition subpoena, if
`it proves to be necessary:
`• The parties mutually exchange their sections for the submission to Judge Hixon at 5 pm Pacific on May 21.
`• At 11 am Pacific on May 22, the parties mutually exchange revisions to their respective sections (if any).
`•
`Juniper consolidates the sections into a single joint submission and files. No edits are permitted to either party’s
`section after the 11 am exchange.
`Please let us know if Finjan agrees to this procedure for the joint filing regarding Ms. Bey’s deposition subpoena, if such a
`submission is necessary.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Josh
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`Joshua P. Glucoft | Irell & Manella LLP | 310.203.7189 | www.irell.com
`
`
`
`
`PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside
`information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is
`strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by
`replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket