`
`Exhibit 3
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 2 of 6
`
`~Kastens, Kristopher
`Friday, May 17, 2019 9:16 AM
`Glucoft, Josh; ~Andre, Paul; ~Caire, Yuridia; ~Hannah, James; ~Hedvat, Shannon;
`~Kobialka, Lisa; ~Lee, Hannah; ~Lee, Michael; ~Manes, Austin; ~Martinez, Cristina;
`~Nguyen, Stephanie; ~Xu, Linjun
`Carson, Rebecca; Heinrich, Alan; Holland, Eileen; Isaac, Shawana; Kagan, Jonathan;
`Manzano, Jim; Mittleman, Harry; Petersen, Ingrid; Quarnstrom, Brian; Theilacker, Leah;
`Wang, Kevin
`RE: Confer
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Josh,
`
`Provide a list of issues that you plan to include in your letter by 2PM today so that Finjan knows what issues to respond
`to in our letter. We also do not agree to Juniper’s schedule for the exchange. We should exchange opening letters at
`10AM on Tuesday, May 20th. You are also incorrect that I didn’t quantify the burden on Ms. Bey for collecting petitions
`from other clients. As I told you in the past, she has hundreds of individual clients, thousands of individual file histories,
`and 20+ years of prosecution history that would require searching. We also disagree that your subpoena requested
`invoices that were not for the patents in suit.
`
`- Kris
`
`Kris Kastens
`Partner
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025
`T 650.752.1715 F 650.752.1815
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`From: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>
`Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 9:16 PM
`To: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Andre, Paul <PAndre@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Caire, Yuridia
`<YCaire@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hannah, James <JHannah@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hedvat, Shannon H.
`<SHedvat@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Kobialka, Lisa <LKobialka@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Hannah
`<HLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Michael H. <MHLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Manes, Austin
`<AManes@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Martinez, Cristina <CMartinez@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Nguyen, Stephanie
`<SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Xu, Linda <LXu@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>;
`Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>;
`Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian
`<BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin <kwang@irell.com>; #Juniper/Finjan
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 3 of 6
`
`[Int] <Juniper-Finjan@irell.com>
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Confer
`
`Kris,
`
`Thank you for conferring today.
`
`
`With respect to the invoices requested under RFP No. 2, your email below suggests that Juniper only requested invoices
`for the Patents-in-Suit, but that is not correct. We asked for invoices “related” to the Patents-in-Suit, where “related” was
`defined broadly. See Document Subpoena, Exhibit A, Definitions at ¶ 2. Invoices “related” to the Patents-in-Suit include
`invoices covering, for example, the ‘822 Patent, which is the claimed parent of the asserted ‘633 Patent (and is also
`expressly discussed in our counterclaims), as well as all other Finjan patents. Moreover, Juniper requested all Documents
`related to Finjan (RFP No. 27), which clearly includes invoices for work performed on Finjan patents. If you intend to
`maintain your position that Juniper did not ask for invoices for work performed on any patents other than the Patents-in-
`Suit and that is the basis for your continued refusal to produce such other invoices, please let us know immediately. We
`are happy to serve an amended document subpoena with a revised RFP No. 2 and to provide Ms. Bey with 12 more days,
`until May 28, to provide the other invoices before her deposition. Please let us know.
`
`With respect to the privilege and redaction logs, during our confer you stated that you believed that all the documents
`listed on those logs were in Ms. Bey’s possession and subsequently collected by Finjan but that you were going to check
`that and get back to us. If any of the documents on those logs were not in Ms. Bey’s possession, please identify those
`documents for us by the Court-ordered deadline for the production of Ms. Bey’s privilege log (tomorrow, May 17). We
`also understand that you will be completing your production of Ms. Bey’s privilege log by tomorrow, as ordered by the
`Court.
`
`With respect to the petitions to accept unintentionally delayed claims of priority, we understand that Ms. Bey will be
`producing all such petitions filed on behalf of Finjan, which Ms. Bey collected after performing a search of her
`records. You were unable to quantify on our call any specific burden to Ms. Bey in searching for other petitions that she
`may have filed for other clients; instead, Ms. Bey’s objection to producing any such other petitions is that they are not
`relevant. Of course, we disagree with Ms. Bey’s determination of relevance for at least the reasons explained during the
`telephonic hearing, and we urge you to reconsider your position. Please let us know if you intend to withdraw this
`improper objection.
`
`With respect to the other requests, I understand that Finjan is producing documents only discussing the Patents-in-Suit and
`contends that documents discussing anything else are irrelevant and will not be produced (or logged, if
`privileged). Again, we disagree with your overly narrowed understanding of what is “relevant,” at least because we
`alleged improprieties by Ms. Bey that extend beyond the Patents-in-Suit, including, for example, with respect to the ‘822
`Patent. Again we urge you to reconsider your position, or we will have to seek court intervention.
`
`Lastly, as discussed during our confer, we will have a proposal for your consideration on the other issues shortly.
`
`Thanks,
`Josh
`
`
`From: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 4:24 PM
`To: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>; ~Andre, Paul <pandre@kramerlevin.com>; ~Caire, Yuridia
`<ycaire@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hannah, James <jhannah@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hedvat, Shannon
`<shedvat@kramerlevin.com>; ~Kobialka, Lisa <lkobialka@kramerlevin.com>; ~Lee, Hannah <hlee@kramerlevin.com>;
`~Lee, Michael <mhlee@kramerlevin.com>; ~Manes, Austin <amanes@kramerlevin.com>; ~Martinez, Cristina
`<cmartinez@kramerlevin.com>; ~Nguyen, Stephanie <SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; ~Xu, Linjun
`<lxu@kramerlevin.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>;
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 4 of 6
`
`Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>;
`Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian
`<BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin <kwang@irell.com>
`Subject: RE: Confer
`
`Josh,
`As a quick follow-up to our call, we collected the invoices for the patents in suit because Juniper only requested invoices
`related to the patents-in-suit.
`- Kris
`
`
`
`Kris Kastens
`Partner
`
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025
`T 650.752.1715 F 650.752.1815
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`
`
`From: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 6:32 PM
`To: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Andre, Paul <PAndre@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Caire, Yuridia
`<YCaire@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hannah, James <JHannah@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hedvat, Shannon H.
`<SHedvat@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Kobialka, Lisa <LKobialka@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Hannah
`<HLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Michael H. <MHLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Manes, Austin
`<AManes@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Martinez, Cristina <CMartinez@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Nguyen, Stephanie
`<SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Xu, Linda <LXu@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>;
`Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>;
`Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian
`<BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin <kwang@irell.com>; #Juniper/Finjan
`[Int] <Juniper-Finjan@irell.com>
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Confer
`
`Kris,
`
`
`Confirmed for tomorrow at 4 pm Pacific to discuss Ms. Bey’s document subpoena. We are looking into the issues raised
`in Yuri’s email and we may be able to propose a compromise on the call tomorrow; if not, then we will follow up with
`you shortly after the call with a proposal.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Josh
`
`
`From: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 3:09 PM
`To: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>; ~Andre, Paul <pandre@kramerlevin.com>; ~Caire, Yuridia
`<ycaire@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hannah, James <jhannah@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hedvat, Shannon
`3
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 5 of 6
`
`<shedvat@kramerlevin.com>; ~Kobialka, Lisa <lkobialka@kramerlevin.com>; ~Lee, Hannah <hlee@kramerlevin.com>;
`~Lee, Michael <mhlee@kramerlevin.com>; ~Manes, Austin <amanes@kramerlevin.com>; ~Martinez, Cristina
`<cmartinez@kramerlevin.com>; ~Nguyen, Stephanie <SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; ~Xu, Linjun
`<lxu@kramerlevin.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>;
`Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>;
`Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian
`<BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin <kwang@irell.com>
`Subject: RE: Confer
`
`Josh,
`
`We are available to meet and confer tomorrow at 4PM. Please have lead trial counsel present as required under Judge
`Hixson’s standing order. We will discuss the issues raised in Yuri’s email at the same time. We are still considering your
`proposed schedule for exchanges.
`
`- Kris
`
`
`
`Kris Kastens
`Partner
`
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025
`T 650.752.1715 F 650.752.1815
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`
`
`Bio
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`
`From: Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 4:56 PM
`To: Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Andre, Paul <PAndre@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Caire, Yuridia
`<YCaire@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hannah, James <JHannah@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Hedvat, Shannon H.
`<SHedvat@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Kobialka, Lisa
`<LKobialka@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Hannah <HLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Michael H.
`<MHLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Manes, Austin <AManes@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Martinez, Cristina
`<CMartinez@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Nguyen, Stephanie <SNguyen@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Xu, Linda
`<LXu@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Cc: Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>;
`Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>; Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>;
`Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>; Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; Petersen, Ingrid
`<ipetersen@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian <BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang,
`Kevin <kwang@irell.com>; #Juniper/Finjan [Int] <Juniper-Finjan@irell.com>
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] Confer
`
`Kris,
`Please provide a time this week that you can confer regarding Ms. Bey’s document subpoena.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-3 Filed 05/22/19 Page 6 of 6
`
`Relatedly, Juniper proposes the following procedure for the joint submission related to Ms. Bey’s deposition subpoena, if
`it proves to be necessary:
`• The parties mutually exchange their sections for the submission to Judge Hixon at 5 pm Pacific on May 21.
`• At 11 am Pacific on May 22, the parties mutually exchange revisions to their respective sections (if any).
`•
`Juniper consolidates the sections into a single joint submission and files. No edits are permitted to either party’s
`section after the 11 am exchange.
`Please let us know if Finjan agrees to this procedure for the joint filing regarding Ms. Bey’s deposition subpoena, if such a
`submission is necessary.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Josh
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`Joshua P. Glucoft | Irell & Manella LLP | 310.203.7189 | www.irell.com
`
`
`
`
`PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside
`information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is
`strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by
`replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
`
`5
`
`