`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (CBN 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (CBN 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (CBN 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff,
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`(jkagan@irell.com)
`Joshua P. Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`(jglucoft@irell.com)
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 Los Angeles,
`California 90067-4276 Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`Rebecca L. Carson (SBN 254105)
`(rcarson@irell.com)
`Kevin Wang (SBN 318024)
`(kwang@irell.com)
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Judge: Honorable William Alsup
`
`
`___________________________________________________________________________________
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05659-WHA
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 47 Filed 04/05/18 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`1.
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) has received requests for the production
`
`of documents in this case from Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Defendant”) (together with
`
`Plaintiff, the “Parties”) that relate to materials generated and produced in the course of Finjan’s prior
`
`litigation with non-party Proofpoint, Inc. (“Proofpoint”) (Case No. 4:13-cv-05808-HSG (N.D. Cal.))
`
`and that contain Proofpoint’s highly sensitive and confidential business information;
`
`2.
`
`WHEREAS, Proofpoint seeks protection from disclosure of its highly confidential
`
`business information to Defendant’s in-house counsel under the terms of the Protective Order in effect
`
`in the present litigation, which at the time of this filing is the Patent Local Rule 2-2 Interim Model
`
`Protective Order, which allows designated in-house counsel of the parties to access Highly
`
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only materials;
`
`3.
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Defendant, and Proofpoint have met and conferred and agreed to
`
`the following Addendum to the Protective Order governing discovery in the above-captioned litigation
`
`to address Proofpoint’s concerns;
`
`4.
`
`THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by Defendant and ORDERED that dissemination of
`
`any of the following materials, including: information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL,”
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” by Proofpoint in the prior litigation captioned
`
`Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:13-cv-05808-HSG (N.D. Cal.); the settlement
`
`agreement and related drafts and correspondence between Plaintiff, Proofpoint, and/or their respective
`
`counsel; or any other materials produced by Finjan in this matter that otherwise contain or refer to the
`
`confidential business information of Proofpoint (collectively, “Proofpoint Protected Material”) shall be
`
`limited to the qualified recipients enumerated in Paragraphs 7.3(a), (c), (d), (e), and (f) set forth in the
`
`Patent Local Rule 2-2 Interim Model Protective Order. For the avoidance of doubt, Proofpoint
`
`Protected Material may not be disclosed to or accessible by any in-house counsel or employee of
`
`Defendant. Additionally, Plaintiff’s access to Proofpoint Protected Material produced by Proofpoint
`
`shall continue to be governed under the terms of the Protective Order issued at Dkt. No. 96 in Finjan,
`
`Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:13-cv-05808-HSG (N.D. Cal.).
`
`
`1
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 47 Filed 04/05/18 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /s/ Rebecca L. Carson
`
`
`Rebecca L. Carson (SBN 254105)
`(rcarson@irell.com)
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, CA 92660-6324
`Tel: (949) 760-0991 | Fax: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`DATED: April 4, 2018
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /s/ Lisa Kobialka
`
`
`Paul Andre (State Bar. No. 196585)
`Lisa Kobialka (State Bar No. 191404)
`James Hannah (State Bar No. 237978)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS &
`FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: __________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Lisa Kobialka
`
`Lisa Kobialka
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable William Alsup
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`2
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05659-WHA
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`April 5, 2018.
`
`