throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 392-1 Filed 03/14/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`DECLARATION OF AUSTIN MANES IN
`SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`DECLARATION OF A. MANES IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 392-1 Filed 03/14/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`I, Austin Manes, declare and state as follows:
`1.
`
`I am an attorney with the law firm Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, counsel for
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”). I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and can testify
`
`competently to those facts. I make this declaration in support of Finjan’s Administrative Motion to File
`
`Documents Under Seal.
`2.
`
`I have reviewed the following documents and confirmed that they contain (1) information
`
`designated as “Confidential,” “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” or “Highly
`
`Confidential – Source Code” by Juniper, (2) the parties’ licensing/settlement negotiations; and (3)
`
`confidential terms in license/settlement agreements between Finjan and Finjan’s licensees:
`
`
`Documents sought to
`be sealed
`Plaintiff Finjan Inc.’s
`Opposition to Juniper’s
`Motion for Summary
`Judgment
`(“Opposition”)
`
`Designating
`party
`Juniper
`and/or
`Finjan
`
`Portions sought to be
`sealed
`Highlighted portions at
`p. 1, lines 10-11; p. 4,
`lines 7-8; p. 11, lines 6-
`26; p. 13, lines 3-6, 20,
`22-26; p. 15, lines 10-
`17, 25-26; p. 16, lines
`25-27; p. 17, lines 1, 5-
`6; p. 19, lines 7-28; p.
`32, lines 12-24; p. 33,
`line 1; p. 36, lines 10-
`12
`
`Declaration of Dr.
`Michael Mitzenmacher
`in Support of Finjan’s
`Opposition (“Mitz
`Decl.”)
`
`Exs. 1, 14-18, 26, 28 to
`Kastens Decl.
`
`Highlighted portions at
`p. 14, lines 7-17; p. 15,
`lines 7-9, 17-18, 28; p.
`16, lines 1-19; p. 17,
`line 18 to p. 18, line 6;
`p. 18, line 13 to p. 19,
`line 26; and p. 20, lines
`9-22
`Entirety
`
`Juniper
`
`Juniper
`
`Reasons for sealing
`
`The highlighted portions
`contain (1) Juniper’s
`confidential information; (2)
`the parties’
`licensing/settlement
`negotiations that are within
`the ambit of Rule 408 of the
`Federal Rules of Evidence;
`(3) confidential terms in
`license/settlement
`agreements between Finjan
`and Finjan’s licensees. See
`Manes Decl. at ¶ 3; see also
`below.
`The highlighted portions
`contain Juniper’s
`confidential information. See
`Manes Decl. at ¶ 4; see also
`below.
`
`Identified exhibits contain
`Juniper’s confidential
`information. See Manes
`Decl. at ¶ 5; see also below.
`
`1
`DECLARATION OF A. MANES IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 392-1 Filed 03/14/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`Exs. 21, 23-24 to
`Kastens Decl.
`
`Entirety
`
`Finjan
`
`Exs. 2, 4-11 to Kastens
`Decl.
`
`Entirety
`
`Juniper
`and/or
`Finjan
`
`Identified exhibits contain
`(1) the parties’
`licensing/settlement
`negotiations that are within
`the ambit of Rule 408 of the
`Federal Rules of Evidence;
`(2) confidential terms in
`license/settlement
`agreements between Finjan
`and Finjan’s licensees. See
`Manes Decl. at ¶ 6; see also
`below.
`Identified exhibits contain
`Juniper’s and Finjan’s
`confidential information.
`See Manes Decl. at ¶ 7; see
`also below.
`
`
`
`
`
`3.
`
`The highlighted portions of the Opposition contain (1) information designated as
`
`“Confidential,” “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” or “Highly Confidential – Source
`
`Code” by Juniper; (2) the parties’ licensing/settlement negotiations that are within the ambit of Rule
`
`408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence; (3) confidential terms in license/settlement agreements between
`
`Finjan and Finjan’s licensees.
`4.
`
`The highlighted portions of Mitz Decl. contain information designated as “Highly
`
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” or “Highly Confidential – Source Code” by Juniper.
`5.
`
`Exhibits 1, 14-18, 26, 28 to Kastens Decl. contain information designated as
`
`“Confidential,” “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” or “Highly Confidential – Source
`
`Code” by Juniper.
`6.
`
`Exhibits 21, 23-24 to Kastens Decl. contain (1) the parties’ licensing/settlement
`
`negotiations that are within the ambit of Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence; (2) confidential
`
`terms in license/settlement agreements between Finjan and Finjan’s licensees.
`7.
`
`Exhibits 2, 4-11 to Kastens Decl. contain information designated as “Highly Confidential
`
`– Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by Juniper and/or Finjan. They contain the parties’ licensing/settlement
`
`negotiations that are within the ambit of Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence or subject to Non-
`
`Disclosure Agreement, and also deposition transcript covered by separate Protective Orders.
`2
`DECLARATION OF A. MANES IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 392-1 Filed 03/14/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and
`
`correct. Executed on March 14, 2019 in Menlo Park, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Austin Manes
` Austin Manes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)
`
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
`
`
`/s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Kristopher Kastens
`
`
`
`3
`DECLARATION OF A. MANES IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket