throbber

`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 391-2 Filed 03/14/19 Page 1 of 3
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`jkagan@irell.com
`Alan Heinrich (SBN 212782)
`aheinrich@irell.com
`Joshua Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`jglucoft@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Rebecca Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`Kevin Wang (SBN 318024)
`kwang@irell.com
`Ingrid M. H. Petersen (SBN) 313927)
`ipetersen@irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSHUA GLUCOFT
`IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JUNIPER
`NETWORKS, INC.’S MOTION TO
`STRIKE UNDISCLOSED THEORIES
`FROM PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`May 2, 2019
`
`Date:
`8:00 a.m.
`Time:
`Courtroom: Courtroom 12, 19th Floor
`Before:
`Hon. William Alsup
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSHUA GLUCOFT ISO
`JUNIPER’S MOTION TO STRIKE
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 391-2 Filed 03/14/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSHUA GLUCOFT
`
`I, Joshua Glucoft, declare as follows:
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of California and an associate at
`
`Irell & Manella LLP, counsel of record in this action for Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`(“Juniper”). I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration, and I could and
`
`would testify competently thereto if called upon to do so. I make this declaration in support of
`
`Juniper’s Motion to Strike New Theories from Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) Motion for
`
`8
`
`Summary Judgment.
`
`9
`
`2.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Finjan’s Infringement
`
`10
`
`Contentions for Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 8,141,154 related to Juniper’s SRX Gateways.
`
`11
`
`3.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of Finjan’s Infringement
`
`12
`
`Contentions for Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 8,141,154 related to Juniper’s Sky ATP.
`
`13
`
`4.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of Finjan’s Infringement
`
`14
`
`Contention for Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 8,141,154 related to Juniper’s ATP Appliance.
`
`15
`
`5.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
`
`16
`
`8,141,154.
`
`17
`
`6.
`
`Juniper made the source code associated with the accused SRX products and Sky
`
`18
`
`ATP service available for inspection no later than March 21, 2018. Juniper also made the source
`
`19
`
`code associated with the accused ATP Appliance product available for inspection no later than
`
`20
`
`June 18, 2018.
`
`21
`
`7.
`
`On March 1, I emailed counsel for Finjan to notify them that Finjan’s motion for
`
`22
`
`summary judgment presented new theories that were not disclosed in Finjan’s infringement
`
`23
`
`contentions. On March 7, 2019, Kris Kastens, counsel for Finjan, replied via email and notified
`
`24
`
`Juniper—for the first time—that Finjan intended to supplement its infringement contentions,
`
`25
`
`asking if Juniper opposed such supplementation. On March 8, 2019, I conferred with Mr. Kastens
`
`26
`
`telephonically and asked him to provide the proposed supplemental infringement contentions so
`
`27
`
`that Juniper could assess the nature of Finjan’s proposed supplementation. As of the date of this
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSHUA GLUCOFT ISO
`JUNIPER’S MOTION TO STRIKE
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 391-2 Filed 03/14/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`
`declaration, Finjan still has not provided Juniper with its proposed supplemental infringement
`
`2
`
`contentions.
`
`3
`
`4
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed this 14th day of March, 2019
`
`5
`
`at Los Angeles, California.
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Joshua Glucoft
`Joshua Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSH GLUCOFT ISO
`JUNIPER’S MOTION TO STRIKE
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket