`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S NOTICE OF
`MOTION AND RENEWED MOTION FOR
`JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
`PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 50(B);
`MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL UNDER FED.
`R. CIV. P. 59; AND MOTION FOR
`CERTIFICATION FOR IMMEDIATE
`APPEAL IN THE ALTERNATIVE
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 353-2 Filed 01/10/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) Renewed Motion for Judgement as a Matter of Law under Rule
`
`50(b), Motion for a New Trial under Rule 59, and Motion for Certification for Immediate Appeal in the
`
`Alternative was brought before the Court. Upon consideration of this motion and the pleadings and
`
`papers file in support of and opposition to the same, and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor, this Court
`
`finds as follows:
`
`[Finjan’s Renewed Motion for Judgement as a Matter of Law is hereby GRANTED. Finjan
`
`presented overwhelming evidence that Juniper’s SRX Gateways with SkyATP and Sky ATP by itself
`
`infringe Claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494 and Juniper failed to rebut that evidence, such that no
`
`reasonable jury could reach a verdict of non-infringement. The Court will enter a verdict of
`
`infringement as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b).]
`
`/
`
`[Finjan’s Motion for a New Trial is hereby GRANTED. Finjan is entitled to a new trial on the
`
`issues of infringement and damages. The Court will issue a scheduling order for a new trial on these
`
`issues.]
`
`/
`
`[Finjan’s requested Certification for Immediate Interlocutory Appeal is hereby GRANTED. All
`
`final rulings and orders arising from the first showdown procedure regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 6,804,780
`
`and 8,677,494 are hereby certified for immediate appeal. The Court will issue an order staying the
`
`remainder of this case pending the outcome of any appeal.]
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`DATED: _______________
`
`
`
`
`
`By: __________________________________
`Hon. William Alsup
`United States District Judge
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`