`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 333 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 4
`
`PBWwbp
`oOoCOHNDHWN
`
`IN THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FINJAN,INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Vv.
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`No. C 17-05659 WHA
`
`SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
`
`When answering the following questions andfilling out this special verdict form, please
`
`follow the directions provided throughoutthis special verdict form andthe final charge to the
`
`jury. Your answerto each question must be unanimous.
`
`We,the jury, unanimously agree to the answersto the following questions as our
`
`verdict.
`
`
`
`
`
`FortheNorthernDistrictofCalifornia
`
`
`
`UnitedStatesDistrictCourt
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UnitedStatesDistrictCourt
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FortheNorthernDistrictofCalifornia
`
`“Oooo~ONtnaLohomi
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 333 Filed 12/14/18 Page 2 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 333 Filed 12/14/18 Page 2 of 4
`
`INFRINGEMENT?
`
`Has Finjan proven by a preponderanceofthe evidence that Juniper’s accused
`
`products meet the “database”limitation as that term is used in Claim 10 ofthe United States
`
`Patent No. 8,677,494?
`
`YES
`
`No <
`
`Ifyou answer“Yes,” you will have foundthat Juniper ’s accused productsinfringe
`
`Claim 10, and you should go to Question No. 2. If “No,” then you will have foundthat
`
`Juniper's accused products do not infringe and you are done — goto the end, sign, and date
`
`the form.
`
`NOTICE?
`
`2.
`
`Has Finjan proven bya preponderanceof the evidence that Finjan andits °494
`
`licensees markedsubstantiallyall of their products covered by the °494 patent and/or Finjan
`
`gave actual notice to Juniper that Juniper was infringing the °494 patent through the accused
`
`products?
`
`YES
`
`No
`
`Ifyou answer “Yes,” then please answerthe next question. If “No,” then Finjan is not
`
`entitled to damages and you are done — please skip to the end, sign, and date the form.
`
`ho
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 333 Filed 12/14/18 Page 3 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 333 Filed 12/14/18 Page 3 of 4
`
`If you answered “Yes” to Question No. 2, please state the earliest date proven by
`
`5a
`
`Finjan by which such marking oractual notice occurred.
`
`DATE: stephZa
`
`ht
`
`Lo)
`
`Ifyou answer “Yes” to both Question Nos. 1 and 2 and supplya date for Question No.
`
`3, then the issue ofdamagesshall be for the judge. You need not concern yourselfwith that
`
`ISSUE.
`
`Wo
`
`
`
`
`
`FortheNorthernDistrictofCalifornia
`
`
`
`UnitedStatesDistrictCourt
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0foYNDAWAF&FWwWDW
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 333 Filed 12/14/18 Page 4 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 333 Filed 12/14/18 Page 4 of 4
`
`You have now reached the endof the verdict form and should review it to ensure it
`
`accurately reflects your unanimousdeterminations. Yourpresiding juror should then sign and
`
`date the verdict form in the spaces below and notifythe judge (through the court security
`
`officer) that you have reached a verdict. The presiding juror should place the verdict form in the
`
`envelope provided and bring it when the jury returns to the courtroomto deliver the verdict.
`
`Dated: December IY. 2018. See
`
`PRESIDING JUROR
`
`Brian Lokd
`
`
`
`
`
`FortheNorthernDistrictofCalifornia
`
`
`
`UnitedStatesDistrictCourt
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
