`
`APPENDIX B – PLAINTIFF’S WITNESS LIST
`
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S SUPPLEMENTAL LIST OF FACT AND EXPERT
`WITNESSES
`
`United States District Court
`For the Northern District of California (San Francisco Division)
`
`
`Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`Case No. 17-cv-05659-WHA Trial Date: December 10, 2018
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) identifies the following witnesses whom it may call live
`
`or by deposition at trial. This list is not a commitment that Finjan will call any particular witness
`
`at trial, or a representation that any of the witnesses listed are available or will appear for trial. If
`
`any third-party witness is unavailable, Finjan reserves the right to use his or her deposition
`
`testimony. With respect to Juniper Networks, Inc.’s (“Juniper”) witnesses, Finjan reserves the
`
`right to introduce testimony through deposition or live examination, as appropriate. Finjan also
`
`reserves the right to call any witnesses listed or called by Juniper, and to revise this list in light of
`
`further rulings by the Court, including any rulings regarding the amount of time allotted for the
`
`parties to present their case at trial, or any other changed circumstances.
`
`I.
`
`FACT AND EXPERT WITNESSES
`
`A. Witnesses That Finjan Will Call in its Case in Chief:
`
`Witness
`Dr. Kevin Arst
`Dr. Harry Bims
`
`Dr. Eric Cole (expert)
`
`John Garland
`
`Philip Hartstein,
`President of Finjan
`
`Substance of Testimony
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding the damages owed to Finjan
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding a tutorial of the technology
`involved in this case
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding Juniper’s infringement of U.S.
`Patent No. 8,677,494 (the “’494 Patent”); background of the ‘494
`Patent; background of the Accused Products; background of cyber
`security
`
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding Finjan’s licensing
`negotiations with Juniper; notice to Juniper of its infringement of
`the ‘494 Patent
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding Finjan’s business and
`licensing of its patents
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 287 Filed 12/03/18 Page 2 of 2
`
`APPENDIX B – PLAINTIFF’S WITNESS LIST
`
`Witness
`David Kroll
`
`Dr. Alessandro Orso
`
`Substance of Testimony
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding the field of the art at the time
`of the invention
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding the patentability of the ‘494
`Patent
`
`B. Witnesses That Finjan Will Call by Deposition:
`
`Witness
`Coonan, Scott
`
`Mathena, Raju
`
`Nagarajan, Chandra
`
`Tenorio, Yuly
`
`Substance of Testimony
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding notice of infringement and
`damages owed to Finjan for Juniper’s infringement.
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding the technology of the accused
`products and Juniper’s infringement of the ‘494 Patent.
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding the technology of the accused
`products and Juniper’s infringement of the ‘494 Patent.
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding the technology of the accused
`products and Juniper’s infringement of the ‘494 Patent.
`
`C. Witnesses That Finjan May Call by Deposition:
`
`Witness
`Bushong, Mike
`
`Gupta, Shelly
`
`Icasiano, Alexander
`
`Manocha, Rakesh
`
`McKenzie, Meredith
`
`Touboul, Shlomo
`
`
`
`Substance of Testimony
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding the technology of the accused
`products, Juniper’s infringement of the ‘494 Patent, and damages
`owed to Finjan for Juniper’s infringement.
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding damages owed to Finjan for
`Juniper’s infringement.
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding operation of Juniper’s accused
`products and damages owed to Finjan.
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding the technology of the accused
`products and Juniper’s infringement of the ‘494 Patent.
`Non-cumulative testimony regarding notice of infringement and
`damages owed to Finjan for Juniper’s infringement.
`Non-cumulative testimony about founding of Finjan.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
