`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 270 Filed 11/27/18 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`FINJAN’S [PROPOSED] SPECIAL
`VERDICT FORM
`
`Trial Date: December 10, 2018
`Time: 7:30 a.m.
`Place: Courtroom 12 – 19th Floor
`Judge: Hon. William Alsup
`
`
`
`
`_______________________________________________________________________________
`FINJAN’S [PROPOSED] SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
`Case No. 17-CV-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 270 Filed 11/27/18 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`When answering the following questions and filling out this Verdict Form, please follow
`
`the directions provided throughout this Verdict Form. Your answer to each question must be
`
`unanimous. Some of the questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in
`
`the Jury Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or
`
`usage of any legal term that appears in the questions below.
`
`We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them
`
`under the instructions of this court as our verdict in this case.
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`FINJAN’S [PROPOSED] SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
`
`Case No. 17-CV-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 270 Filed 11/27/18 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`QUESTION 1: Has Finjan proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Juniper’s
`
`SRX Gateways in combination with Sky ATP and/or Sky ATP alone literally infringe Claim 10
`
`of the ’494 Patent?
`
`Yes __________
`
`
`
`
`
`No ___________
`
`
`
`If you answered “Yes” to Question 1, please skip to Question 3. If you did not answer “Yes” to
`
`Question 1, please answer Question 2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`QUESTION 2: Has Finjan proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Juniper’s
`
`SRX Gateways in combination with Sky ATP and/or Sky ATP alone infringe, under the doctrine
`
`of equivalents, Claim 10 of the ’494 Patent?
`
`Yes __________
`
`
`
`
`
`No ___________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FINJAN’S [PROPOSED] SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
`
`Case No. 17-CV-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 270 Filed 11/27/18 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`QUESTION 3: Has Juniper proven by clear and convincing evidence that Claim 10 of
`
`the ’494 patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. Section 101?
`
`Yes __________
`
`
`
`
`
`No ___________
`
`
`
`
`
`Answer Question 4 only if you have found Claim 10 to be infringed in Questions 1 or 2 above and
`
`not invalid in Question 3 above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`FINJAN’S [PROPOSED] SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
`
`Case No. 17-CV-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 270 Filed 11/27/18 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`QUESTION 4: What sum of money do you find from a preponderance of the evidence
`
`would fairly and reasonably compensate Finjan for Juniper’s infringement of Claim 10?
`
`$ ________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to ensure it accurately
`
`reflects your unanimous determinations. The Presiding Juror should then sign and date the
`
`verdict form in the spaces below and notify the Security Guard that you have reached a verdict.
`
`The Presiding Juror should retain possession of the verdict form and bring it when the jury is
`
`brought back into the courtroom.
`
`
`DATED: __________, 2018
`
`
`By: ______________________________
`
`Presiding Juror
`
`FINJAN’S [PROPOSED] SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
`
`Case No. 17-CV-05659-WHA
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
