throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 261 Filed 11/27/18 Page 1 of 5
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`jkagan@irell.com
`Joshua P. Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`jglucoft@irell.com
`Casey Curran (SBN 305210)
`ccurran@irell.com
`Sharon Song (SBN 313535)
`ssong@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Rebecca L. Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`Kevin Wang (SBN 318024)
`kwang@irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`)
`
`)
`DEFENDANT JUNIPER NETWORKS,
`)
`INC.’S MOTION FOR
`)
`ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE
`)
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`)
`
`)
`Judge: Hon. William Alsup
`)
`)
`
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`L & MANELLA LLP
`stered Limited Liability
`
`1012560
`
`
`
`
`
`JUNIPER’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 261 Filed 11/27/18 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) and
`Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”) respectfully moves
`the Court for an Order instructing the Clerk of the Court to file under seal the following
`documents:
`• Juniper’s unredacted Motion In Limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence and Argument
`Regarding Cyphort and the ATP Appliance Product (“Juniper’s MIL 1”);
`• Finjan’s unredacted Opposition to Juniper’s MIL 1;
`• Juniper’s unredacted Motion In Limine No. 3 to Exclude the Recording of the
`November 24, 2015 Call Between the Parties and Any Reference to Who Made the
`Recording (“Juniper’s MIL 3”);
`• Juniper’s unredacted Motion In Limine No. 4 to Exclude Evidence and Argument on Non-
`Infringing Alternatives (“Juniper’s MIL 4”);
`• The following exhibits to the Declaration of Kevin Wang in Support of Juniper’s Motions
`In Limine Nos. 1-5 (“Wang Decl.”):
`o Unredacted Exhibit 1 to the Wang Decl. (excerpts from the Expert Report of
`Dr. Eric Cole);
`o Unredacted Exhibit 2 to the Wang Decl. (excerpts from the Expert Report of
`Kevin M. Arst);
`o Unredacted Exhibit 3 to the Wang Decl. (excerpts from the Expert Rebuttal Report
`of Dr. Alessandro Orso);
`o Unredacted Exhibit 5 to the Wang Decl. (excerpts from the deposition transcript of
`Finjan’s employee John Garland);
`o Unredacted Exhibit 11 to the Wang Decl. (the Declaration of Scott J. Coonan in
`Support of Juniper’s MIL 3);
`o Unredacted Exhibit 15 to the Wang Decl. (excerpts from the November 14, 2018
`deposition transcript of Finjan’s expert Dr. Eric B. Cole);
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`1012560
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`JUNIPER’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 261 Filed 11/27/18 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`• The following exhibits to the Declaration of Austin Manes in Support of Finjan’s
`Oppositions to Juniper’s Motions In Limine Nos. 1-3 (“Manes Decl. I”):
`o Exhibit 1 to the Manes Decl. I (excerpts from Juniper’s source code);
`o Exhibit 3 to the Manes Decl. I (excerpts from the deposition transcript of Juniper’s
`employee Yuly Tenorio);
`o Exhibit 6 to the Manes Decl. I (excerpts from a letter and attachments that Finjan
`sent to Cyphort);
`o Exhibit 7 to the Manes Decl. I (letter from Finjan to Cyphort’s counsel);
`o Exhibit 8 to the Manes Decl. I (presentation slides created by Finjan for Cyphort);
`o Unredacted Exhibit 9 to the Manes Decl. I (excerpts from Juniper’s Second
`Supplemental Response to Finjan’s First Set of Interrogatories);
`o Exhibit 10 to the Manes Decl. I (transcript of a call between Finjan and Juniper);
`o Unredacted Exhibit 11 to the Manes Decl. I (excerpts from the deposition transcript
`of Juniper’s employee Scott J. Coonan); and
`• Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Austin Manes in Support of Finjan’s Oppositions to
`Juniper’s Motions In Limine Nos. 4-5 (“Manes Decl. II”) (excerpts from the November 14,
`2018 deposition transcript of Finjan’s expert Dr. Eric B. Cole).
`This motion is based upon this Notice of Motion; the accompanying Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities; the Declaration of Sharon Song (the “Sealing Declaration”); such other evidence and
`arguments as the Court may consider; and all other matters of which the Court may take judicial
`notice.
`
`MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) and Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5,
`Juniper hereby submits a request for an Order instructing the Clerk of the Court to file under seal
`the unredacted documents described above.
`As discussed in the Sealing Declaration, the redacted portions of Juniper’s MIL 1; redacted
`portions of Finjan’s Opposition to Juniper’s MIL 1; redacted portions of Juniper’s MIL 3; redacted
`portions of Juniper’s MIL 4; redacted portions of Exhibits 1-3, 5, 11, and 15 to the Wang Decl.;
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`1012560
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`JUNIPER’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 261 Filed 11/27/18 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`redacted portions of Exhibit 9 and 11 to the Manes Decl. I; Exhibits 1, 3 and 10 to the Manes
`Decl. I; and Exhibit 21 to the Manes Decl. II contain sealable confidential information that relate to
`the financial information concerning and/or technical underpinnings and development of Juniper’s
`highly proprietary software—which includes much information that Juniper maintains as trade
`secrets. Juniper expends significant effort in maintaining the secrecy of its software architecture
`and development, including, for example, implementing strict screening procedures for visitors to
`its engineering campus. Public disclosure of essential nonpublic facts about Juniper’s software
`development could materially impair Juniper’s intellectual property rights and could cause serious
`competitive consequences to Juniper’s business positioning.
`As further discussed in the Sealing Declaration, the redacted portions of Juniper’s MIL 1;
`redacted portions of Finjan’s Opposition to Juniper’s MIL 1; redacted portions of Juniper’s MIL 3;
`redacted portions of Juniper’s MIL 4; redacted portions of Exhibits 1-3, 5, 11, and 15 to the Wang
`Decl.; redacted portions of Exhibit 9 and 11 to the Manes Decl. I; Exhibit 10 to the Manes Decl. I;
`and Exhibit 2 to the Manes Decl. II also contain sealable confidential information that relate to
`Juniper and Finjan’s confidential licensing information that both parties regularly treat as highly
`confidential within their businesses and make substantial efforts not to disclose to the public.
`As further discussed in the Sealing Declaration, Exhibits 6-8 to the Manes Decl. I have
`been designated confidential by Finjan.
`This request is narrowly tailored to seal only that material for which compelling reasons to
`seal have been established. The bases for this request are set forth in further detail in the
`accompanying Sealing Declaration. On these grounds, Juniper respectfully requests that the Court
`order sealed the redacted portions of the documents described above.
`
`[Signature page to follow]
`
`
`
`1 Juniper moves to seal Exhibit 2 to the Manes Decl. II in full because the document, which
`Finjan served in support of its oppositions to Juniper’s MILs, is in a PDF format that is not able to
`be redacted in portions.
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`1012560
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`JUNIPER’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 261 Filed 11/27/18 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`Dated: November 27, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`By:
` /s/ Sharon Song
`
`Sharon Song
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`1012560
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`JUNIPER’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket