throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 250 Filed 11/26/18 Page 1 of 2
`
`1 8 0 0 A V E N U E O F T H E S T A R S , S U I T E 9 0 0
`L O S A N G E L E S , C A 9 0 0 6 7 - 4 2 7 6
`T E L E P H O N E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 7 7 - 1 0 1 0
`F A C S I M I L E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 0 3 - 7 1 9 9
`
`
`I R E L L & M A N E L L A L L P
`
`A REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP
`INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
`
`8 4 0 N E W P O R T C E N T E R D R I V E , S U I T E 4 0 0
`
`N E W P O R T B E AC H , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 6 6 0 - 6 3 2 4
`
`T E L E P H O N E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 0 9 9 1
`F A C S I M I L E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 5 2 0 0
`W E B S I T E : w w w . i r e l l . c o m
`
`W R I T E R ' S D I R E C T
`
`T E L E P H O N E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 5 2 2 2
`R C a r s o n @ i r e l l . c o m
`
`November 26, 2018
`
`
`
`Hon. William Alsup
`
`U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
`Re:
`Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Alsup:
`Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”) writes to request that the Court strike
`Paragraph 6 of the Declaration Of Kristopher Kastens In Support Of Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Reply
`Brief To Its Motion To Exclude Opinions Of Damages Expert Dr. Keith Ugone (Dkt. 245-1).
`In Paragraph 6 of Mr. Kastens’s declaration Mr. Kastens avers: “Juniper never informed
`Finjan that its production of source code for the accused products was specific to only certain
`models of SRX products.” This statement is incorrect and should be stricken. As a professional
`courtesy, Juniper provided Finjan with notice of this error, and allowed Finjan the opportunity to
`correct it. Finjan refused. See Ex. 1 (Email Chain and Attached Letter to Kramer Levin).
`Juniper did, in fact, “inform[] Finjan that its production of source code for the accused
`products was specific to only certain models of SRX products.” Specifically, on March 26, 2018,
`Juniper responded to Finjan’s Interrogatory Request No. 3 as follows: “Juniper directs Finjan to
`the directory structure provided on the secured review computer to identify the products
`corresponding to the source code by product name and release and the directories and
`subdirectories of the source code corresponding to the active source code incorporated into each
`of the products. The table below shows the versions of Junos corresponding to specific SRX
`Gateways.” Ex. 2 (Juniper’s Resp. to Finjan’s Interrogatory No. 3). Additionally, Juniper
`provided the following table in its response, which demonstrates that the source code varies
`between the different SRX models.
`
`Junos
`12.1
`
`Junos
`12.1X44
`
`Junos
`12.1X45
`
`Junos
`12.1X46
`
`Junos
`12.1X47
`
`Junos
`12.3X48
`
`Junos
`15.1X49
`
`Junos
`17.3
`
`Junos
`17.4
`
`3/28/12
`✓
`✓
`✕
`N/A
`✓
`✕
`✓
`
`1/18/13
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`
`7/17/13
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`
`12/30/13
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`
`8/18/14
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`
`3/6/15
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`
`6/30/15
`✕
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✓
`✕
`
`8/25/17 12/21/17
`✕
`✕
`✕
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✕
`
`
`
`
`Release
`Date
`SRX110
`SRX220
`SRX3XX
`SRX550
`SRX1400
`SRX1500
`SRX3400
`
`10613782
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 250 Filed 11/26/18 Page 2 of 2
`I R E L L & M A N E L L A L L P
`
`A REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP
`INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SRX3600
`SRX4100
`SRX4200
`SRX5400
`SRX5600
`SRX5800
`vSRX
`cSRX
`
`See id.
`
`✓
`✕
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✕
`
`✓
`✕
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✕
`
`✓
`✕
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`✕
`
`✓
`✕
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`
`✓
`✕
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`
`✓
`✕
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`
`✕
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✓
`✕
`
`Juniper believes Finjan submitted this false statement as part of its effort to expand the list
`of accused products from “(1) Juniper’s SRX Gateways used in combination with Sky ATP and
`(2) Sky ATP alone” (See Dkt. 98 (Finjan’s Mot. for Summ. J.) at 1; Dkt. 185 (Order re Finjan Mot.
`for Summ. J.) at 3) to include SRX Gateways that contain code that could allow them to interface
`with Sky ATP, whether or not they were ever used in combination with each other. This issue is
`addressed in detail in the Daubert motions and other pre-trial briefings the parties have submitted
`or are submitting to the Court.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Rebecca L. Carson
`Rebecca L. Carson
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`10613782
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket