`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
` JUNIPER NETWORK, INC.,
`Defendant.
` /
`
`No. C 17-05659 WHA
`
`ORDER RE SCOPE OF
`MOTIONS IN LIMINE
`
`The Court has reviewed defendant Juniper Network, Inc.’s letter brief requesting that
`plaintiff Finjan, Inc., be compelled to comply with the Court’s guidelines for trial and final
`pretrial conference by tomorrow at noon and Finjan’s response thereto (Dkt. Nos. 232–33).
`Specifically, Juniper takes issue with Finjan’s third and fourth motions in limine, arguing that
`they violate paragraph 2(f) of the guideline, which states that “[e]ach motion should address a
`single topic.”
`The Court agrees with Juniper that each of the motions at issue covers multiple topics
`in violation of paragraph 2(f). Juniper, however, shall please help the Court by responding to
`the motions at issue in any event. Possibly some of the topics will be deferred for resolution
`during trial itself. Which topics to defer, however, will not be determined until the final
`pretrial conference.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: November 16, 2018.
`
`
`WILLIAM ALSUP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`For the Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`