`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
` JUNIPER NETWORK, INC.,
`Defendant.
` /
`
`No. C 17-05659 WHA
`
`ORDER RE REQUEST FOR
`RECONSIDERATION
`
`The Court has reviewed defendant Juniper Network, Inc.’s request to reconsider in part
`the order dated October 26 (Dkt. Nos. 213, 214). The request is GRANTED IN PART. The
`briefing schedule in connection with Juniper’s Daubert motion is as follows:
`Juniper shall file its opening brief by NOVEMBER 12.
`1.
`Finjan shall file its opposition by NOVEMBER 19 AT NOON.
`2.
`Juniper shall file its reply by NOVEMBER 23 AT NOON.
`3.
`The hearing on Juniper’s Daubert motion is hereby set for NOVEMBER 29 AT
`4.
`8:00 A.M.
`The Court recognizes that Juniper’s reply is due the Friday after Thanksgiving. This due date
`is deemed necessary, however, due to time constraints.
`The opening and opposition briefs shall not exceed FIFTEEN PAGES each. The reply
`brief shall not exceed EIGHT PAGES. The parties’ attachments (e.g., declarations, exhibits) to
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`For the Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 215 Filed 10/26/18 Page 2 of 2
`
`their corresponding briefs shall not exceed FIFTY PAGES (this page limit does not include the
`expert report).
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: October 26, 2018.
`
`
`WILLIAM ALSUP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`For the Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
