Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 206 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`jkagan@irell.com
`Joshua Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`jglucoft@irell.com
`Casey Curran (SBN 305210)
`ccurran@irell.com
`Sharon Song (SBN 313535)
`ssong@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Rebecca Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`Kevin Wang (SBN 318024)
`kwang@irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND
`[PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
` Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 206 Filed 10/09/18 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) and
`
`Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their
`
`respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following request to modify the case schedule to require a
`
`date certain by which Juniper will further reduce its asserted prior art:
`
`WHEREAS, on February 23, 2018, the Court issued a Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 34);
`
`WHEREAS, on February 23, 2018, the Court issued an Amended Case Management Order
`
`(Dkt. No. 35), which only amended the date of the pretrial conference;
`
`WHEREAS, on August 9, 2018, the Parties met and conferred regarding Finjan’s request for a
`
`further election of asserted prior art and subsequently reached an agreement to modify the scheduling
`
`order to provide a date certain by which Juniper will reduce its asserted prior art;
`
`WHEREAS, on September 18, 2018, the Parties met and conferred regarding extending the
`
`deadline for Juniper to serve rebuttal expert reports related to damages issues until November 7, 2018,
`
`to provide additional time for scheduling depositions;
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request a modified scheduling order pursuant to which, no
`
`later than 45 days after service of Juniper’s updated invalidity contentions pursuant to Patent Local
`
`Rule 3-3 (i.e., October 25, 2018), Juniper will serve an Election of Asserted Prior Art, which shall
`identify no more than 6 grounds1 per patent and no more than a total of 35 grounds;
`WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request a modified schedule order pursuant to which, no
`
`later than November 7, 2018, Juniper shall serve its rebuttal expert reports related to damages;
`
`WHEREAS, there are and have been no other modifications in the case related to the Court’s
`
`scheduling order, other than as described above; and
`
`WHEREAS, this requested time modification would not have an effect on the remaining
`
`schedule for the case.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`1 The parties agree that a “ground” comprises one or more prior art references in combination. For
`example, anticipation under reference A would be one ground, obviousness under the combination of
`references A and B is another ground, and obviousness under the combination of A, B, and C is
`another different ground.
`
`
`
`STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`1
`
` Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 206 Filed 10/09/18 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 5, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)
`Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)
`James Hannah (SBN 237978)
`Kristopher Kastens (SBN 254797)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`Dated: October 5, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Rebecca Carson
`
`Rebecca L. Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)
`
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
`/s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Kristopher Kastens
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`2
`
` Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 206 Filed 10/09/18 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`There being a showing of good cause based on the parties’ stipulation, the schedule in the Case
`
`Management Order is modified as set forth below:
`1) Not later than 45 days after service of its supplemental invalidity contentions (i.e., by
`
`October 25, 2018), Juniper shall serve an Election of Asserted Prior Art, which shall
`
`identify no more than 6 grounds per patent and no more than a total of 35 grounds,
`
`where a “ground” comprises one or more prior art references in combination. For
`
`example, anticipation under reference A would be one ground, obviousness under the
`
`combination of references A and B is another ground, and obviousness under the
`
`combination of A, B, and C is another different ground.
`2) Juniper shall serve its rebuttal expert reports related to damages issues by November 7,
`
`2018.
`
`
`
`DATED: _________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________
`The Honorable William Alsup
`
`
`
`STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`3
`
` Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`October 9, 2018.
`
`