`
`8 4 0 N E W P O R T C E N T E R D R I V E , S U I T E 4 0 0
`N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0 - 6 3 2 4
`T E L E P H O N E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 0 9 9 1
`F A C S I M I L E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 5 2 0 0
`
`
`I R E L L & M A N E L L A L L P
`
`A REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP
`INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
`
`1 8 0 0 A V E N U E O F T H E S T A R S , S U I T E 9 0 0
`
`L O S A N G E L E S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 0 0 6 7 - 4 2 76
`
`August 29, 2018
`
`T E L E P H O N E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 7 7 - 1 0 1 0
`F A C S I M I L E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 0 3 - 7 1 9 9
`W E B S I T E : w w w . i r e l l . c o m
`
`W R I T E R ' S D I R E C T
`
`T E L E P H O N E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 0 3 - 7 1 8 9
`
`
`Hon. William Alsup
`
`U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
`Re:
`Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Alsup:
`In the Order Granting In Part Early Motion for Summary Judgment on ’494 Patent dated
`August 24, 2018 (Dkt. No. 185), Your Honor states:
`Using ellipses, Juniper justifies the panel’s dictum by quoting “all operations . . .
`which could ever be deemed potentially hostile” from the aforementioned
`embodiment, this to assert that the claimed list must refer to a pre-existing master list.
`This, however is a sleight of hand. Counsel’s ellipses delete crucial limiting language,
`namely “in the Downloadable code,” i.e., the ’194 patent actually says “a list of all
`operations in the Downloadable code which could ever be deemed potentially hostile.”
`
`Dkt. No. 185 at 9:20-25.
`Juniper wishes to clarify the record on this point: Juniper’s counsel did not add (or modify)
`any ellipses to this quote. Rather, Juniper copied this quote verbatim from the PTAB’s Final Written
`Decision (i.e., Dkt. No. 126 (Opposition Brief) at 12:16-19; Dkt. No. 183 (Response to Court’s
`Questions) at 7:23-24). The ellipses used in this quote were provided by the PTAB, and indicate the
`reasoning the PTAB used to support its construction of the claim. See Dkt. No. 183-1 at 11. Indeed,
`where Juniper quoted to the same portion of the specification elsewhere in its briefs (as opposed to
`the PTAB’s Final Written Decision), Juniper included the complete quote from the ’194 Patent
`Specification without any ellipses. See Dkt. No. 126 at 11:10-13 and Dkt. No. 183 at 6:22-24.
`Juniper’s counsel intended no sleight of hand, and apologizes for not clarifying in our brief that the
`ellipses in the quotation were copied from the PTAB’s Final Written Decision, not added by Juniper’s
`counsel.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/ Jonathan S. Kagan________
`Jonathan S. Kagan
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Attorneys for Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`10569970
`
`
`
`
`