throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 188 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 1
`
`8 4 0 N E W P O R T C E N T E R D R I V E , S U I T E 4 0 0
`N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0 - 6 3 2 4
`T E L E P H O N E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 0 9 9 1
`F A C S I M I L E ( 9 4 9 ) 7 6 0 - 5 2 0 0
`
`
`I R E L L & M A N E L L A L L P
`
`A REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP
`INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
`
`1 8 0 0 A V E N U E O F T H E S T A R S , S U I T E 9 0 0
`
`L O S A N G E L E S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 0 0 6 7 - 4 2 76
`
`August 29, 2018
`
`T E L E P H O N E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 7 7 - 1 0 1 0
`F A C S I M I L E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 0 3 - 7 1 9 9
`W E B S I T E : w w w . i r e l l . c o m
`
`W R I T E R ' S D I R E C T
`
`T E L E P H O N E ( 3 1 0 ) 2 0 3 - 7 1 8 9
`
`
`Hon. William Alsup
`
`U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
`Re:
`Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Alsup:
`In the Order Granting In Part Early Motion for Summary Judgment on ’494 Patent dated
`August 24, 2018 (Dkt. No. 185), Your Honor states:
`Using ellipses, Juniper justifies the panel’s dictum by quoting “all operations . . .
`which could ever be deemed potentially hostile” from the aforementioned
`embodiment, this to assert that the claimed list must refer to a pre-existing master list.
`This, however is a sleight of hand. Counsel’s ellipses delete crucial limiting language,
`namely “in the Downloadable code,” i.e., the ’194 patent actually says “a list of all
`operations in the Downloadable code which could ever be deemed potentially hostile.”
`
`Dkt. No. 185 at 9:20-25.
`Juniper wishes to clarify the record on this point: Juniper’s counsel did not add (or modify)
`any ellipses to this quote. Rather, Juniper copied this quote verbatim from the PTAB’s Final Written
`Decision (i.e., Dkt. No. 126 (Opposition Brief) at 12:16-19; Dkt. No. 183 (Response to Court’s
`Questions) at 7:23-24). The ellipses used in this quote were provided by the PTAB, and indicate the
`reasoning the PTAB used to support its construction of the claim. See Dkt. No. 183-1 at 11. Indeed,
`where Juniper quoted to the same portion of the specification elsewhere in its briefs (as opposed to
`the PTAB’s Final Written Decision), Juniper included the complete quote from the ’194 Patent
`Specification without any ellipses. See Dkt. No. 126 at 11:10-13 and Dkt. No. 183 at 6:22-24.
`Juniper’s counsel intended no sleight of hand, and apologizes for not clarifying in our brief that the
`ellipses in the quotation were copied from the PTAB’s Final Written Decision, not added by Juniper’s
`counsel.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/ Jonathan S. Kagan________
`Jonathan S. Kagan
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Attorneys for Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`10569970
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket