throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 170 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`FINJAN’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 170 Filed 07/27/18 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, Plaintiff,
`
`Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”), brings this Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. There are a good cause
`
`and compelling reasons to file the following documents identified below under seal, because they
`
`contain confidential information of Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”). See Declaration of Austin Manes
`
`in support of Finjan’s Administrative Motion (“Manes Decl.”).
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`Finjan’s Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal should be granted because there
`
`are a good cause and compelling reasons as identified below to seal the portions of the documents below:
`
`
`Documents sought to
`be sealed
`Plaintiff Finjan Inc.’s
`Second Amended
`Complaint (“SAC”)
`
`Portions sought to be
`sealed
`Highlighted portions
`at page 55, ll. 3-22;
`page 56, ll. 1-27; p.
`57, ll. 1-2.
`
`Designating
`party
`Juniper
`
`Exhibits 33 and 34 to
`SAC
`
`Entirety
`
`Juniper
`
`Reasons for sealing
`
`The highlighted portions
`contain Juniper’s
`confidential information.
`See Manes Decl. at ¶ 3; see
`also below.
`Identified exhibits contain
`Juniper’s confidential
`information such as source
`code. See Manes Decl. at
`¶ 4; see also below.
`
`As set forth in the accompanying Declaration of Austin Manes in support of Finjan’s
`
`Administrative Motion to File under Seal, the above identified documents contain information that
`
`Juniper has designated as “Confidential,” “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” or “Highly
`
`Confidential – Source Code.” These portions should be sealed because the prejudice to Juniper from
`
`the disclosure of this information to its competitors would likely outweigh any benefit of disclosing the
`
`information to the public. See Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 727 F.3d 1214, 1225 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
`
`(“We conclude that Apple and Samsung have such an interest because they could suffer competitive
`
`harm if this information is made public, and the district court erred by concluding otherwise. In
`
`particular, it seems clear that if Apple's and Samsung's suppliers have access to their profit, cost, and
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`FINJAN’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 170 Filed 07/27/18 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`margin data, it could give the suppliers an advantage in contract negotiations, which they could use to
`
`extract price increases for components.”).
`
`Furthermore, the portions sought to be sealed here are narrowly tailored to include only “sealable
`
`material,” as set forth in the accompanying Declaration of Austin Manes. To comply with Civil Local
`
`Rule 79-5, Finjan has filed publicly the non-confidential portions of above identified documents.
`
`Attached hereto are redacted and unredacted versions of the same documents.
`III. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, Finjan respectfully requests that the Court grant its Administrative
`
`Motion to File Documents Under Seal.
`
`
`
`Dated: July 27, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Paul J. Andre (State Bar No. 196585)
`Lisa Kobialka (State Bar No. 191404)
`James Hannah (State Bar No. 237978)
`Kristopher Kastens (State Bar No. 254797)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`FINJAN’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`2
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket