`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
`TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
`
`Hon. William H. Alsup
`
`Complaint Served: October 20, 2017
`Current Response Date: November 13, 2017
`New Response Date: December 22, 2017
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`10380665
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 16 Filed 11/09/17 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Juniper shall answer
`
`or otherwise respond to the complaint in this matter by December 22, 2017. If Juniper files
`
`counterclaims, Finjan shall answer or otherwise respond to Juniper’s counterclaims by January 26,
`
`2018. If Juniper files a pleading motion, Finjan must file its opposition to Juniper’s pleading
`
`6
`
`motion by January 19, 2018.
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: ___________________________
`
`
`Hon. William H. Alsup
`Judge, United States District Court
`
`
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`10380665
`
`
`November 9, 2017.
`
`S D ISTRICT
`
`C O
`
`E
`
`T
`
`A
`
`S T
`I T I S S O O R D E R E D
`A S M O D I F I E D
`i a m A l s u p
`
`J u d g e W i
`
`l
`
`l
`
`D
`
`UNITE
`
`N O R
`
`U
`
`R
`
`T
`
`ORNIA
`
`C ALIF
`
`T
`
`F
`
`O
`
`H ER
`
`N
`
`DISTRI C T
`
`