throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 156 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`FINJAN’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
`UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 156 Filed 07/13/18 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, Plaintiff,
`
`Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”), brings this Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. The documents identified
`
`below contain Finjan’s confidential information, which Finjan has designated as “Highly Confidential –
`
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Specifically, there exists good cause and compelling reasons to file the
`
`following documents under seal:
`
`
`Identification of Documents to be Sealed
`
`Plaintiff Finjan Inc.’s Letter Brief Opposing Defendant
`Juniper Networks, Inc.’s Motion to Compel, at p. 1, ¶ 1
`Declaration of John Garland in Support of Plaintiff Finjan
`Inc.’s Letter Brief Opposing Defendant Juniper Networks,
`Inc.’s Motion to Compel, at ¶ 2, ll. 8-10
`Ex. 1 (excerpts from deposition transcript of Mr. John
`Garland)
`Ex. 3 (excerpt from Finjan’s privilege log)
`II.
`ARGUMENT
`
`Entity that Designated the
`Information to be Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only
`
`Finjan
`
`Finjan
`
`Finjan
`
`Finjan
`
`This Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal should be granted because there is
`
`good cause and compelling reasons to seal the identified documents. Finjan seeks to seal only those
`
`documents and portions of documents that it has identified as containing its confidential information
`
`pursuant to the Protective Order.
`
`Finjan seeks to seal Finjan’s Letter Brief Opposing Defendant Juniper’s Motion to Compel
`
`redacted portions at page 1, ¶ 1, because, as set forth in the accompanying declaration of Kristopher
`
`Kastens in Support of this Administrative Motion (“Kastens Sealing Declaration”), these portions
`
`contain information that Finjan has designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”
`
`Specifically, the redacted portion discloses Finjan’s confidential business and licensing practices—
`
`specifically, Finjan’s licensing practices and negotiations. Finjan treats its licenses as highly confidential
`
`within its business and makes substantial efforts not to disclose the terms of its licenses to the public. If
`
`such provisions were made public, it could negatively impact Finjan’s bargaining positions in future
`
`licensing negotiations with competitors and no public interest will be served by disclosing this
`1
`FINJAN’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
`UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 156 Filed 07/13/18 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`information publicly.
`
`Finjan also seeks to seal the Declaration of John Garland in Support of Plaintiff Finjan Inc.’s
`
`Letter Brief Opposing Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.’s Motion to Compel redacted portion at ¶ 2, ll.
`
`8-10, because, as set forth in the accompanying Kastens Sealing Declaration, this declaration contains
`
`information that Finjan has designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Specifically,
`
`these excerpts disclose Finjan’s confidential business and licensing practices—specifically, Finjan’s
`
`licensing practices and negotiations. Finjan treats its licenses as highly confidential within its business
`
`and makes substantial efforts not to disclose the terms of its licenses to the public. If such provisions
`
`were made public, it could negatively impact Finjan’s bargaining positions in future licensing
`
`negotiations with competitors and no public interest will be served by disclosing this information
`
`publicly.
`
`Finjan also seeks to seal Exhibits 1 and 3 to its Letter Brief because, as set forth in the
`
`accompanying Kastens Sealing Declaration, these documents contain information that Finjan has
`
`designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Specifically, these excerpts disclose
`
`Finjan’s confidential business and licensing practices—specifically, Finjan’s licensing practices and
`
`negotiations, and information regarding Finjan’s privileged communications regarding such licensing
`
`practices and negotiations, respectively. Finjan treats its licenses as highly confidential within its
`
`business and makes substantial efforts not to disclose the terms of its licenses to the public. If such
`
`provisions were made public, it could negatively impact Finjan’s bargaining positions in future licensing
`
`negotiations with competitors and no public interest will be served by disclosing this information
`
`publicly.
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, Finjan has filed publicly the relevant excerpts of information
`
`that are not confidential. Attached hereto are redacted and unredacted versions of the documents set
`
`forth above.
`III. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, Finjan respectfully requests that the Court grant its Administrative
`
`Motion to File Documents Under Seal.
`
`
`2
`FINJAN’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
`UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 156 Filed 07/13/18 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 13, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Kristopher Kastens
`
`Paul J. Andre (State Bar No. 196585)
`Lisa Kobialka (State Bar No. 191404)
`James Hannah (State Bar No. 237978)
`Kristopher Kastens (State Bar No. 254797)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`3
`FINJAN’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
`UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket