Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 110-1 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`DECLARATION OF KRISTOPHER
`KASTENS IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN,
`INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
`DEFENDANT JUNIPER NETWORKS,
`INC.’S THIRD, FOURTH, FIFTH, AND
`SIXTH COUNTERCLAIMS AND TO
`STRIKE JUNIPER’S TENTH, ELEVENTH,
`TWELFTH, AND FOURTEENTH
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`July 26, 2018
`Date:
`8:00 a.m.
`Time:
`Courtroom: Courtroom 12, 19th Floor
`Judge:
`Hon. William H. Alsup
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________________________________________________________
`KASTENS DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MOTION TO CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS & STRIKE AFFIRM. DEFENSES
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 110-1 Filed 06/15/18 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`I, Kristopher Kastens, declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney with the law firm Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, counsel of
`
`record for Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”). I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and can testify
`
`competently to those facts. I make this declaration in support of Finjan, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss
`
`Juniper Networks, Inc.’s (“Juniper”) Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims and to Strike
`
`Juniper’s Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Fourteenth Affirmative Defense.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494, produced
`
`by Finjan bearing bates numbers FINJAN-JN 003821-48.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,141,154, produced
`
`by Finjan bearing bates numbers FINJAN-JN 002025-40.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 7,647,633, produced
`
`by Finjan bearing bates numbers FINJAN-JN 000954-83.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 7,613,926, produced
`
`by Finjan bearing bates numbers FINJAN-JN 000618-43.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the prosecution history
`
`of the ‘494 Patent, bates numbered FINJAN-JN 004348-57, FINJAN-JN 004421-23, FINJAN-JN
`
`004944-53, and FINJAN-JN 004959-60.
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Disclosure of
`
`Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions and Document Production Accompanying Disclosure
`
`Pursuant to Patent Local Rules 3-1 and 3-2 from Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., Case No. 14-cv-
`
`02998-RS, dated December 4, 2014.
`
`8.
`Election of Asserted Claims from Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., Case No. 14-cv-02998-HSG, dated
`
`Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Preliminary
`
`March 3, 2017.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Fifth
`
`Supplemental Responses to Defendant Symantec Corp.’s Interrogatories (No. 1), filed as Exhibit J to
`
`the Cassidy Declaration in Support of Symantec’s Motion to Amend Its Answer to Add an Inequitable
`
`1
`KASTENS DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MOTION TO CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS & STRIKE AFFIRM. DEFENSES
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 110-1 Filed 06/15/18 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`Conduct Defense from Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., Case No. 14-cv-02998-HSG, Dkt. 242-11 (N.D.
`
`Cal. Aug. 18, 2017).
`
`10.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Final Election
`
`of Asserted Claims, filed as Exhibit H to the Cassidy Declaration in Support of Symantec’s Motion to
`
`Amend Its Answer to Add an Inequitable Conduct Defense from Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., Case
`
`No. 14-cv-02998-HSG, Dkt. 242-9 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2017).
`
`11.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Fourth
`
`Supplemental Responses to Defendant Symantec Corp.’s Interrogatories (No. 1), filed as Exhibit I to
`
`the Cassidy Declaration in Support of Symantec’s Motion to Amend Its Answer to Add an Inequitable
`
`Conduct Defense from Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., Case No. 14-cv-02998-HSG, Dkt. 242-11 (N.D.
`
`Cal. Aug. 18, 2017).
`
`12.
`Motion to Amend Its Answer to Add Inequitable Conduct Affirmative Defense from Finjan, Inc. v.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of the Order Denying Defendant’s
`
`Symantec Corp., Case No. 14-cv-02998-HSG, Dkt. 285 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 27, 2017).
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,092,194.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,804,780,
`
`produced by Finjan bearing bates numbers FINJAN-JN 000443-60.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,079,086.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,154,844,
`
`produced by Finjan bearing bates numbers FINJAN-JN 000001-20.
`
`17.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 16 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent Application Serial No.
`
`11/281,839, “Ross,” IPR2016-00151, Ex. 1003.
`
`18.
`Patent in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR2016-00159, Paper No. 50 (P.T.A.B. April 11,
`
`Attached as Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of Final Written Decision of the ‘494
`
`2017).
`
`2
`KASTENS DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MOTION TO CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS & STRIKE AFFIRM. DEFENSES
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 110-1 Filed 06/15/18 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true
`
`and correct. Executed on June 15, 2018 in Menlo Park, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Kristopher Kastens
`
`ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)
`
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
`
`
`/s/ Lisa Kobialka
`Lisa Kobialka
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`KASTENS DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MOTION TO CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS & STRIKE AFFIRM. DEFENSES
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`