throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 1-19 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 1-19 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 19
`EXHIBIT 19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 1-19 Filed 09/29/17 Page 2 of 4
`Sky Advanced Threat Prevention
`>
`Sky Advanced Threat Prevention Administration Guide
`
`TechLibrary >
`
`How is Malware Analyzed and Detected?
`
`Sky ATP uses a pipeline approach to analyzing and detecting malware. If an analysis reveals that the file is absolutely
`malware, it is not necessary to continue the pipeline to further examine the malware. See Figure 1.
`
`Figure 1: Example Sky ATP Pipeline Approach for Analyzing Malware
`
`Each analysis technique creates a verdict number, which is combined to create a final verdict number between 1 and
`10. A verdict number is a score or threat level. The higher the number, the higher the malware threat. The SRX Series
`device compares this verdict number to the policy settings and either permits or denies the session. If the session is
`denied, a reset packet is sent to the client and the packets are dropped from the server.
`
`Cache Lookup
`When a file is analyzed, a file hash is generated, and the results of the analysis are stored in a database. When a file is
`uploaded to the Sky ATP cloud, the first step is to check whether this file has been looked at before. If it has, the
`stored verdict is returned to the SRX Series device and there is no need to re-analyze the file. In addition to files
`scanned by Sky ATP, information about common malware files is also stored to provide faster response.
`
`Cache lookup is performed in real time. All other techniques are done offline. This means that if the cache lookup
`does not return a verdict, the file is sent to the client system while the Sky ATP cloud continues to examine the file
`using the remaining pipeline techniques. If a later analysis returns a malware verdict, then the file and host are
`flagged.
`
`Antivirus Scan
`The advantage of antivirus software is its protection against a large number of potential threats, such as viruses,
`trojans, worms, spyware, and rootkits. The disadvantage of antivirus software is that it is always behind the malware.
`The virus comes first and the patch to the virus comes second. Antivirus is better at defending familiar threats and
`known malware than zero-day threats.
`
`Sky ATP utilizes multiple antivirus software packages, not just one, to analyze a file. The results are then fed into the
`machine learning algorithm to overcome false positives and false negatives.
`
`Static Analysis
`Static analysis examines files without actually running them. Basic static analysis is straightforward and fast,
`typically around 30 seconds. The following are examples of areas static analysis inspects:
`
`Metadata information—Name of the file, the vendor or creator of this file, and the original data the file was compiled on.
`Previous Page
`Next Page
`Categories of instructions used—Is the file modifying the Windows registry? Is it touching disk I/O APIs?.
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 1-19 Filed 09/29/17 Page 3 of 4
`File entropy—How random is the file? A common technique for malware is to encrypt portions of the code and then decrypt it
`during runtime. A lot of encryption is a strong indication a this file is malware.
`
`The output of the static analysis is fed into the machine learning algorithm to improve the verdict accuracy.
`
`Dynamic Analysis
`The majority of the time spent inspecting a file is in dynamic analysis. With dynamic analysis, often called
`sandboxing, a file is studied as it is executed in a secure environment. During this analysis, an operating system
`environment is set up, typically in a virtual machine, and tools are started to monitor all activity. The file is uploaded
`to this environment and is allowed to run for several minutes. Once the allotted time has passed, the record of activity
`is downloaded and passed to the machine learning algorithm to generate a verdict.
`
`Sophisticated malware can detect a sandbox environment due to its lack of human interaction, such as mouse
`movement. Sky ATP uses a number of deception techniques to trick the malware into determining this is a real user
`environment. For example, Sky ATP can:
`
`Generate a realistic pattern of user interaction such as mouse movement, simulating keystrokes, and installing and launching
`common software packages.
`Create fake high-value targets in the client, such as stored credentials, user files, and a realistic network with Internet access.
`Create vulnerable areas in the operating system.
`
`Deception techniques by themselves greatly boost the detection rate while reducing false positives. They also boosts
`the detection rate of the sandbox the file is running in because they get the malware to perform more activity. The
`more the file runs the more data is obtained to detect whether it is malware.
`
`Machine Learning Algorithm
`Sky ATP uses its own proprietary implementation of machine learning to assist in analysis. Machine learning
`recognizes patterns and correlates information for improved file analysis. The machine learning algorithm is
`programmed with features from thousands of malware samples and thousands of goodware samples. It learns what
`malware looks like, and is regularly re-programmed to get smarter as threats evolve.
`
`Threat Levels
`Sky ATP assigns a number between 0-10 to indicate the threat level of files scanned for malware and the threat level
`for infected hosts. See Table 1.
`
`Table 1: Threat Level Definitions
`
`Threat Level
`
`Definition
`
`0
`
`1 - 3
`
`4 - 6
`
`7 -10
`
`Clean; no action is required.
`
`Low threat level.
`
`Medium threat level.
`
`High threat level.
`
`For more information on threat levels, see the Sky ATP Web UI online help.
`
`Modified: 2017-06-07
`
`Previous Page
`
`Next Page
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 1-19 Filed 09/29/17 Page 4 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document1-19 Filed 09/29/17 Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket