Case 3:16-cv-06180-WHA Document 189 Filed 08/15/17 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`Kathryn D. Zalewski (SBN 263119)
` Kathryn.Zalewski@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`950 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`Telephone: (650) 858-6000
`Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
`
`Natalie Hanlon Leh (pro hac vice)
` Natalie.HanlonLeh@wilmerhale.com
`Mary (Mindy) V. Sooter (pro hac vice)
` Mindy.Sooter@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 2600
`Denver, Colorado 80202
`Telephone: (720) 274-3135
`Facsimile: (702) 272-3133
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-
`Defendant
`Comcast Communications, LLC
`
`
`
`Michael K. Plimack (SBN 133869)
` mplimack@cov.com
`Winslow Taub SBN 233456)
` wtaub@cov.com
`Nathan E. Shafroth (SBN: 232505)
` nshafroth@cov.com
`David M. Jolley (SBN: 191164)
` djolley@cov.com
`Alice J. Ahn (SBN: 245723)
` aahn@cov.com
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One Front Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 591-6000
`
`Robert T. Haslam (SBN 71134)
` rhaslam@cov.com
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 632-4700
`
`Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim-
`Plaintiffs
`Open TV, Inc. and Nagravision SA
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS,
`)
`Case No. 3:16-cv-6180-WHA
`LLC,
`)
`
`STIPULATION RESOLVING ALL
`
`)
`OUTSTANDING ISSUES IN DISPUTE IN
`
`)
`PENDING CASE AND FOR DISMISSAL
`
`)
`OF ALL CLAIMS AND
`v.
`
`)
`COUNTERCLAIMS; [PROPOSED]
`
`)
`ORDER
`OPENTV, INC., and NAGRAVISION SA,
`)
`)
`
`Defendants.
`)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Comcast Cable
`Communications, LLC (“Comcast”) and Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs OpenTV, Inc. and
`Nagravision SA (collectively, “OpenTV”) (“the Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel,
`respectfully submit: (i) a Stipulation to resolve all outstanding issues in dispute in the above-captioned
`
`
`
`STIPULATION / [PROPOSED] ORDER; No. 3:16-cv-6180-WHA
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-06180-WHA Document 189 Filed 08/15/17 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`case (the “N.D. Cal. Litigation”) and for dismissal of all claims and counterclaims between the Parties in
`this action; and (ii) a Proposed Order.
`
`
`STIPULATION
`WHEREAS, the Parties wish to resolve all outstanding issues in dispute between the Parties in
`the N.D. Cal. Litigation and to dismiss without prejudice all claims and counterclaims between the
`Parties this action, resulting in the termination of all ongoing litigation between the Parties in the
`Northern District of California. Accordingly,
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Comcast and OpenTV, through their
`respective counsel of record, that OpenTV has provided Comcast with covenants not to sue on the
`following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,895,595 (the “’595 Patent”); 6,985,586 (the “’586 Patent”);
`6,345,389 (the “’389 Patent”); 7,028,327 (the “’327 Patent”); 7,243,139 (the “’139 Patent”); 6,530,082
`(the “’082 Patent”); 7,900,229 (the “’229 Patent”); 6,725,461 (the “’461 Patent”); 5,907,322 (the “’322
`Patent”); and 6,799,328 (the “’328 Patent”).
`IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Comcast will terminate the Inter Partes Review (“IPR”)
`proceedings it has initiated on the ’389 Patent and ’327 Patent, and that Comcast will not initiate any
`future IPR proceedings involving the ’595 Patent, the ’586 Patent, the ’389 Patent, the ’327 Patent, the
`’139 Patent, the ’229 Patent, the ’461 Patent, the ’322 Patent, the ’328 Patent, or the ’082 Patent
`provided neither OpenTV nor any future assignee of these patents threatens or brings any further action
`against Comcast on these patents.
`IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that OpenTV will not appeal this Court’s August 4, 2017
`Order re Pilot Motions for Summary Judgment.
`IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Comcast will not file any motion for attorneys’ fees in
`connection with the Parties’ pilot motions for summary judgment; nor will either party file any motion
`for fees, costs, or sanctions arising out of any other aspect of this N.D. Cal. Litigation.
`IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that, subject to the Court’s approval, the Second Amended
`Complaint of Comcast will be dismissed without prejudice.
`IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that, subject to the Court’s approval, the Counterclaims
`
`
`
`2
`STIPULATION / [PROPOSED] ORDER; No. 3:16-cv-6180-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-06180-WHA Document 189 Filed 08/15/17 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`brought by OpenTV in response to Comcast’s Second Amended Complaint will be dismissed without
`prejudice.
`IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that, subject to the Court’s approval, each party shall bear its
`own costs and fees for this N.D. Cal. Litigation.
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`Dated: August 15, 2017
`
`
`
`Dated: August 15, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Natalie Hanlon Leh
`Natalie Hanlon Leh
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`/s/ Michael K. Plimack
`Michael K. Plimack
`Counsel for Defendants
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`I, Michael Plimack, hereby attest, pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1, that I have received authorization to
`
`electronically sign and file this document from each of the persons identified in the signature block.
`
`Dated: August 15, 2017
`
`
`/s/ Michael K. Plimack
`Michael K. Plimack
`Counsel for Defendant
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: ____________, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WILLIAM ALSUP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`3
`STIPULATION / [PROPOSED] ORDER; No. 3:16-cv-6180-WHA
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`