throbber
Case 8:19-cv-02192-GW-AS Document 77 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:1967
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`John P. Schnurer, Bar No. 185725
`JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com
`Yun Louise Lu, Bar No. 253114
`LLu@perkinscoie.com
`Kyle R. Canavera Bar No. 314664
`KCanavera@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11452 El Camino Real, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130-2080
`Telephone: 858.720.5700
`Facsimile: 858.720.5799
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`TCT Mobile (US) Inc. and Huizhou TCL Mobile
`Communication Co. Ltd.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Case No. 8:19-cv-02192-GW-ASx
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`JOINT STIPULATION OF
`DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
`
`Consolidated Case No.:
`2:20-cv-01252-GW-ASx
`
`Judge: Hon. George H. Wu
`
`v.
`
`TCT MOBILE (US) INC. AND
`HUIZHOU TCL MOBILE
`COMMUNICATION CO. LTD.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
`Case No. 8:19-cv-02192-GW-ASx
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-02192-GW-AS Document 77 Filed 06/16/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:1968
`
`
`Plaintiff Ancora Technologies, Inc. (“Ancora”) and Defendants TCT Mobile
`
`(US) Inc., Huizhou TCL Mobile Communications Co., Ltd., and Shenzhen TCL
`
`Creative Cloud Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively “TCL”) hereby stipulate,
`
`through their respective counsel of record, that all claims and counterclaims for
`
`relief that were asserted in the above-captioned actions be and hereby are dismissed
`
`with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
`
`Ancora and TCL shall each bear their own fees and costs in connection with
`
`this action.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`DATED: June 16, 2021
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`
`By: /s/ Kyle R. Canavera
`John P. Schnurer, (SBN 185725)
`JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com
`Yun Louise Lu, (SBN 253114)
`LLu@perkinscoie.com
`Kyle R. Canavera (SBN 314664)
`KCanavera@perkinscoie.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`TCT Mobile (US) Inc. and Huizhou TCL
`Mobile Communication Co. Ltd.
`
`DATED: June 16, 2021
`
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Marc Lorelli*
`Marc Lorelli (pro hac vice)
`mlorelli@brookskushman.com
`John S. LeRoy (pro hac vice)
`jleroy@brookskushman.com
`John P. Rondini (pro hac vice)
`jrondini@brookskushman.com
`Mark A. Cantor (pro hac vice)
`mcantor@brookskushman.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Ancora Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
` *
`
` Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2), the filing party attests that TCL’s counsel
`concurs in the content of this stipulation and has authorized its filing with his
`electronic signature.
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
`Case No. 8:19-cv-02192-GW-ASx
`
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket