throbber
Case 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM Document 29-1 Filed 10/18/19 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:282
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN UTILITY PATENT
`CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
`
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`
`
`
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC v. NETSUITE INC.
`
`8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM
`
`Matter
`
`Deadline
`
`Disclosure of Asserted Claims
`and Infringement Contentions
`and Document Production
`Accompanying Disclosure
`(N.D. Patent L.R. 3-1(a)-(h)
`to 3-2(a)-(e)).
`
`Scheduling Conference
`Date plus fourteen (14)
`days (N.D. Patent L.R. 3-1
`and 3-2).
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`Request
`11/15/19
`
`Last Day to File Motions to
`Add Parties and Amend
`Pleadings without leave
`Disclosure of Invalidity
`Contentions and Production
`Accompanying Invalidity
`Contentions1 (N.D. Patent
`L.R. 3- 3(a)-(d) to 3-4(a)-(b)).
`
`Scheduling Conference
`Date plus sixty (60) days.
`
`Deadline for Infringement
`Contentions Disclosure
`plus forty-nine (49) days
`(adapted from N.D. Patent
`L.R. 3-3).
`
`1/14/20
`
`1/3/20
`
`Defendant’s
`Request
`Stayed
`pending
`resolution of
`“application
`program(s).”
`If necessary,
`14 days after
`ruling on early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`
`Stayed. If
`necessary, 49
`days after
`Infringement
`Contentions
`after ruling on
`early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`
`1 In a declaratory judgment action in which a party files a pleading seeking declaratory judgment that a patent is invalid, and
`where the parties anticipate that no claim or counterclaim of infringement will be asserted (in this or any other proceeding), the
`parties shall alter their proposed dates in accordance with N.D. Patent L.R. 3-5.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM Document 29-1 Filed 10/18/19 Page 2 of 7 Page ID #:283
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN UTILITY PATENT
`CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
`
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`
`
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC v. NETSUITE INC.
`
`8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM
`
`Matter
`
`Deadline
`
`Exchange of Proposed Terms
`for Construction (N.D. Patent
`L.R. 4- 1(a)-(b)).
`
`Deadline for Invalidity
`Contentions Disclosure
`plus fourteen (14) days2
`(N.D. Patent L.R. 4-1).
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`Request
`1/17/20
`
`Exchange of Preliminary
`Claim Constructions and
`Extrinsic Evidence (N.D.
`Patent L.R. 4- 2(a)-(c).
`
`1/31/20
`
`Exchange of Proposed
`Terms for Construction
`plus fourteen (14) days
`(adapted from N.R. Patent
`L.R. 4-2).
`
`Joint Status Report Regarding
`Technology Tutorial
`
`Sixty (60) days in advance
`of the Claim Construction
`Hearing (Order Setting
`Scheduling Conference).
`
`
`
`Defendant’s
`Request
`Stayed. If
`necessary, 14
`days after
`Invalidity
`Contentions
`after ruling on
`early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`Nov. 8, 2019
`for
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`Remainder: If
`necessary, 14
`days after
`Exchange of
`Proposed
`Terms for
`Construction
`after ruling on
`early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`
`
`2 Similarly, in any action in which patent validity is not expected to be at issue, the parties shall alter their proposed dates in
`accordance with N.D. Patent L.R. 4-1(a).
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM Document 29-1 Filed 10/18/19 Page 3 of 7 Page ID #:284
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN UTILITY PATENT
`CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
`
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`
`
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC v. NETSUITE INC.
`
`8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM
`
`Matter
`
`Deadline
`
`Completion of Claim
`Construction Discovery3
`(N.D. Patent L.R. 4-4.)
`
`Exchange of Preliminary
`Claim Constructions and
`Extrinsic Evidence plus
`twenty-eight (28) days.4
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`Request
`2/28/20
`
`Defendant’s
`Request
`Nov. 22, 2019
`for
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`Remainder: If
`necessary, 28
`days after
`exchange of
`Preliminary
`Claim
`Constructions
`and Extrinsic
`Evidence after
`ruling on early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`
`3 As is implicit in the Northern District Rules, Claim Construction Discovery includes expert discovery addressing issues related
`to claim construction.
`
`4 The Court’s procedure deviates from the Northern District Rules by deferring the filing of the Prehearing Statement until after
`the Completion of Claim Construction Discovery. (Cf. N.D. Patent L.R. 4-3.)
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM Document 29-1 Filed 10/18/19 Page 4 of 7 Page ID #:285
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN UTILITY PATENT
`CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
`
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`
`
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC v. NETSUITE INC.
`
`8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM
`
`Matter
`
`Deadline
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`Request
`3/6/20
`
`Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement (N.D.
`Patent L.R. 4-3(a)-(e)).
`
`Completion of Claim
`Construction Discovery
`plus seven (7) days.
`
`Opening Claim Construction
`Briefs5
`
`Deadline for filing of Joint
`Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement plus
`seven (7) days.
`
`3/13/20
`
`Defendant’s
`Request
`Nov. 26, 2019
`for
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`Remainder: If
`necessary, 7
`days after
`Completion of
`Claim
`Construction
`Discovery
`after ruling on
`early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`Dec. 6, 2019
`for
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`Remainder: If
`necessary, 7
`days after
`Joint Claim
`Construction
`and
`Prehearing
`Statement
`after ruling on
`early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`
`5 The Northern District Rules contemplate the filing of an opening brief, a responsive brief, and a reply brief. The Court’s
`procedure deviates from that practice and instead sets a schedule for the filing of simultaneous opening and responsive briefs.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM Document 29-1 Filed 10/18/19 Page 5 of 7 Page ID #:286
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN UTILITY PATENT
`CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
`
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`
`
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC v. NETSUITE INC.
`
`8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM
`
`Matter
`
`Deadline
`
`Responsive Claim
`Construction Briefs
`
`Deadline for filing of
`Opening Claim
`Construction Briefs plus
`fourteen (14) days.
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`Request
`3/27/20
`
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`Twenty-five (25) days
`after the Responsive Brief
`Deadline (set for Tuesday
`at 9:00 a.m.).
`
`4/21/20
`
`Defendant’s
`Request
`Dec. 13, 2019
`for
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`Remainder: If
`necessary, 14
`days after
`Opening
`Claim
`Construction
`Briefs after
`ruling on early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`January 7,
`2020
`for
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`Remainder: If
`necessary, 25
`days after
`Responsive
`Claim
`Construction
`Briefs after
`ruling on early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM Document 29-1 Filed 10/18/19 Page 6 of 7 Page ID #:287
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN UTILITY PATENT
`CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
`
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`
`
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC v. NETSUITE INC.
`
`8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM
`
`Matter
`
`Deadline
`
`Claim Construction Ruling
`Date
`
`Projected as 94 days
`(approximately three
`months) after the hearing.
`The actual date is likely to
`vary and may be earlier or
`later.
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`Request
`7/23/20
`
`Production Related to
`Reliance Upon Advice of
`Counsel (N.D. Patent L.R. 3-
`7(a)-(c).)
`
`Thirty-two (32) days after
`the projected Claim
`Construction Ruling Date
`(adapted from N.D. Patent
`L.R. 3-7).
`
`Fact Discovery Cut-Off
`
`Last Day to Serve Initial
`Expert Reports (unrelated to
`claim construction).
`Last Day to File Motions
`(Except Daubert and all other
`Motions in Limine).
`
`Approximately one (1)
`month after the deadline for
`the Production Related to
`Reliance on Advice of
`Counsel and 18 weeks
`before the Final Pretrial
`Conference (“FPTC”).
`16 weeks before the FPTC.
`
`16 weeks before the FPTC.
`
`8/24/20
`
`9/24/20
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Defendant’s
`Request
`April 13, 2020
`for
`“application
`program(s)”
`
`Remainder: If
`necessary, 94
`days after
`Claim
`Construction
`Hearing after
`ruling on early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`To be
`determined
`after ruling on
`early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`To be
`determined
`after ruling on
`early
`Markman on
`“application
`program(s)”
`17 weeks
`before the
`FPTC
`
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM Document 29-1 Filed 10/18/19 Page 7 of 7 Page ID #:288
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN UTILITY PATENT
`CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
`
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`
`
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC v. NETSUITE INC.
`
`8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM
`
`Matter
`
`Deadline
`
`Last Day to Serve Rebuttal
`Expert Reports (unrelated to
`claim construction).
`Last Day to Conduct
`Settlement Proceedings.
`Expert Discovery Cut-Off.
`Last Day to File Daubert
`Motions.
`Last Day to File Motions in
`Limine (excluding Daubert
`Motions).
`Final Pre-Trial Conference
`(Friday at 10:30 a.m.).
`Revised: July 31, 2019
`
`
`
`
`12 weeks before the FPTC.
`
`9 weeks before the FPTC.
`
`8 weeks before the FPTC.
`7 weeks before the FPTC.
`
`4 weeks before the FPTC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`Request
`
`
`Defendant’s
`Request
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket