`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Matthew G. Berkowitz (Bar No. 310426)
`Yue (Joy) Wang (Bar No. 300594)
`SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
`1460 El Camino Real, 2nd Floor
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: 650.838.3600
`Fax: 650.838.3699
`Email: matthew.berkowitz@shearman.com
`joy.wang@shearman.com
`
`
`L. Kieran Kieckhefer (Bar No. 251978)
`SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
`535 Mission Street, 25th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: 415.616.1100
`Fax: 415.616.1339
`Email: kieran.kieckhefer@shearman.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Netsuite, Inc.
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
` Case No. 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFMx
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
`TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
`COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN
`30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3)
`Complaint Served: July 16, 2019
`Current Response Date: August 6, 2019
`New Response Date: September 5, 2019
`
`
`NETSUITE, INC.,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFMx
`1
`
`
`
`Case 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM Document 17 Filed 07/30/19 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:89
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Local Rule 8-3 by
`and between plaintiff Uniloc 2017 LLC (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Netsuite, Inc.
`(“Defendant”), through their undersigned counsel, that Defendant may have a thirty-
`day extension of time, up to and including September 5, 2019, to timely file an
`answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-captioned action.1
`No prior extension has been required by Defendant.
`
`Dated:
`
`July 30, 2019
`
`
`1 Defendant does not intend to waive any defenses, jurisdictional or otherwise.
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFMx
`2
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
`/s/ Matthew G. Berkowitz
`By:
`
`Matthew G. Berkowitz
`Attorney for Defendant, Netsuite, Inc.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`PRINCE LOBEL TYE LLP
`/s/ James J. Foster
`By:
`
`James J. Foster
`Attorney for Plaintiff, Uniloc 2017 LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`July 30, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFM Document 17 Filed 07/30/19 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:90
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`ATTESTATION OF FILER
`I hereby attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is
`submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
`/s/ Matthew G. Berkowitz
`Dated: July 30, 2019
`By:
`
`
`Matthew G. Berkowitz
`Attorney for Defendant, Netsuite, Inc.
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`I, the undersigned, declare:
`I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the
`age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1460 El Camino
`Real, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
`On July 30, 2019, I caused the foregoing document to be electronically filed
`with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of
`such filings to all known counsel of record. I declare under penalty of perjury under
`the laws of the United States of America and the State of California that the above is
`true and correct.
` Executed on July 30, 2019, at Menlo Park, California.
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Matthew G. Berkowitz
`Matthew G. Berkowitz
`Attorney for Defendant, Netsuite, Inc.
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 8:19-cv-01151-JLS-DFMx
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
