throbber
Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 1 of 13 Page ID
` #:1605
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`to
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.’S OPPOSITION
`TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PENDING INTER PARTES
`REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 2 of 13 Page ID
` #:1606
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 3 of 13 Page ID
` #:1607
`
`Trial Statistics
`IPR, PGR, CBM
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`January 2018
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 4 of 13 Page ID
` #:1608
`
`Petitions by Trial Type
`(All Time: 9/16/12 to 1/31/18)
`
`IPR
`7,437
`92%
`
`8,067 Total
`
`CBM
`539
`7%
`
`PGR
`91
`1%
`
`Trial types include Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post Grant Review (PGR), and Covered
`Business Method (CBM).
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 5 of 13 Page ID
` #:1609
`
`Petitions Filed by Technology in FY18
`(FY18 to date: 10/1/17 to 1/31/18)
`
`Mechanical &
`Business Method
`96
`19%
`
`510 Total
`
`Electrical/Computer
`305
`60%
`
`Chemical
`36
`7%
`
`Bio/Pharma
`73
`14%
`
`Design
`0
`0%
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 6 of 13 Page ID
` #:1610
`
`Petitions Filed by Month
`(January 2018 and Previous 12 Months: 1/1/17 to 1/31/18)
`237
`250
`225
`200
`175
`150
`125
`100
`
`Jan-17
`
`IPR
`
`(482 IPRs in FY18)
`
`129
`
`126
`
`108
`
`Jan-18
`(15 CBMs in FY18)
`6
`1 3
`
`0
`
`Jan-17
`
`CBM
`
`Jan-18
`
`5
`
`10
`
`05
`
`7
`
`(13 PGRs in FY18)
`5
`2 2
`
`PGR
`
`Jan-18
`
`0
`
`Jan-17
`
`10
`
`05
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 7 of 13 Page ID
` #:1611
`
`Preliminary Response Filing Rates
`Pre- and Post-Rule To Allow New Testimonial Evidence (NTE)
`(All Time: 9/16/12 to 1/31/18)
`
`86% 83%
`
`86% 86%
`
`NTE
`
`49%
`
`NTE
`
`62%
`
`Pre Post
`Bio/Pharma
`
`Pre Post
`Chemical
`
`71%
`
`64%
`
`NTE
`35%
`
`Pre Post
`Design
`
`85% 85%
`
`83% 88%
`
`NTE
`
`39%
`
`NTE
`
`36%
`
`Pre Post
`Electrical/Computer
`
`Pre Post
`Mechanical &
`Business Method
`
`The rule to allow new testimonial evidence was effective May 2, 2016.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 8 of 13 Page ID
` #:1612
`
`Institution Rates
`(FY13 to FY18: 10/1/12 to 1/31/18)
`
`Instituted
`
`Denied
`
`100%
`
`90%
`
`80%
`
`70%
`
`60%
`
`50%
`
`40%
`
`30%
`
`20%
`
`10%
`
`0%
`
`87%
`
`191
`
`29
`
`75%
`
`664
`
`223
`
`68%
`
`1,012
`
`67%
`
`1,011
`
`469
`
`496
`
`63%
`
`955
`
`557
`
`2,000
`
`1,800
`
`1,600
`
`1,400
`
`1,200
`
`1,000
`
`800
`
`600
`
`400
`
`00
`
`02
`
`61%
`
`333
`
`215
`
`FY18
`
`7
`
`FY16
`FY15
`FY14
`FY13
`Institution rate for each fiscal year is calculated by dividing petitions instituted by
`decisions on institution (i.e., petitions instituted plus petitions denied). The outcomes
`of decisions on institution responsive to requests for rehearing are excluded.
`
`FY17
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 9 of 13 Page ID
` #:1613
`
`Institution Rates by Technology
`(All Time: 9/16/12 to 1/31/18)
`
`Bio/Pharma
`
`Chemical
`
`Design
`
`62% (369 of 597)
`
`66% (270 of 408)
`
`41% (17 of 41)
`
`Electrical/Computer
`
`69% (2,453 of 3,580)
`
`Mechanical &
`Business Method
`Institution rate for each technology is calculated by dividing petitions instituted by
`decisions on institution (i.e., petitions instituted plus petitions denied). The outcomes
`of decisions on institution responsive to requests for rehearing are excluded.
`
`69% (1,057 of 1,529)
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 10 of 13 Page ID
` #:1614
`
`Pre-Institution Settlements
`(FY13 to FY18: 10/1/12 to 1/31/18)
`
`16%
`
`291
`
`14%
`
`242
`
`14%
`
`249
`
`Settlement Rate
`9%
`
`Settlements
`23
`
`12%
`
`127
`
`FY17
`FY16
`FY15
`FY14
`FY13
`Settlement rate for each year is calculated by dividing pre-institution settlements by
`the sum of proceedings instituted, denied institution, dismissed, terminated with a
`request for adverse judgment, and settled before decision on institution.
`
`12%
`
`76
`
`FY18
`
`20%
`
`18%
`
`16%
`
`14%
`
`12%
`
`10%
`
`8%
`
`6%
`
`4%
`
`2%
`
`0%
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 11 of 13 Page ID
` #:1615
`
`Post-Institution Settlements
`(FY13 to FY18: 10/1/12 to 1/31/18)
`Settlement Rate
`90%
`
`40%
`
`110
`
`Settlements
`18
`
`29%
`
`212
`
`22%
`
`194
`
`22%
`
`187
`
`FY17
`FY16
`FY15
`FY14
`FY13
`Settlement rate for each year is calculated by dividing post-institution settlements by
`proceedings terminated post-institution (i.e., settled, dismissed, terminated with a
`request for adverse judgment, and final written decision), excluding joined cases.
`
`23%
`
`60
`
`FY18
`
`85%
`
`65%
`
`45%
`
`25%
`
`5%
`
`-15%
`
`-35%
`
`-55%
`
`-75%
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 12 of 13 Page ID
` #:1616
`
`Status of Petitions
`(All Time: 9/16/12 to 1/31/18)
`8,067
`
`796
`
`1,009
`
`76
`
`31
`
`4,186
`
`1,969
`
`Instituted Claims Unpatentable
`No Claim: 367 (19%)
`Some Claims: 309 (16%)
`All Claims: 1,270 (65%)
`
`388
`
`770
`
`781
`
`42
`
`259
`
`1,946
`
`Decisions
`Final Writ.
`Judgment
`Req. Adv.
`
`Dismissed
`
`Settled
`
`Institution
`Open Post-
`
`Joined
`
`Instituted
`
`Denied
`
`Judgment
`Req. Adv.
`
`Dismissed
`
`Settled
`
`Institution
`Open Pre-
`
`Petitions
`
`These figures reflect the latest status of each petition. The outcomes of decisions on
`institution responsive to requests for rehearing are incorporated. Once joined to a base
`case, a petition remains in the Joined category regardless of subsequent outcomes.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 60-1 Filed 03/05/18 Page 13 of 13 Page ID
` #:1617
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket