` #:1355
`
`Exhibit M
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00130-RWS Document 232 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3520Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 57-14 Filed 02/26/18 Page 2 of 3 Page ID
`
` #:1356
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`DSS Technology Management, Inc.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Intel Corporation, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15-CV-130
`§
`
`§
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`§
`§
`
`ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`Before the Court is Intel Corporation’s Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (Dkt.
`
`No. 186).
`
`Per Plaintiff DSS Technology Management, Inc.’s notice of withdrawal of its opposition
`
`to Intel’s Motion, the Court GRANTS Intel Corporation’s Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes
`
`Review.
`
`The Court ORDERS that the case is STAYED, pending a final written decision from the
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board “PTAB” on IPR2016-000287, IPR2016-000288, IPR2016-
`
`000289, and IPR2016-000290. Within seven days of the latest final written decision on
`
`IPR2016-000287, IPR 2016-000288, IPR2016-000289, and IPR2016-000290, the parties shall
`
`file a joint status report, and DSS Technology Management, Inc., after conferring with Intel,
`
`shall file a motion proposing a case schedule if any asserted claims of the patents-in-suit survive.
`
`This stay does not relieve the parties their obligation to promptly pay the technical advisor
`
`in accordance with the Court's Order entered this same day.
`
`Exhibit M, Page 356
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00130-RWS Document 232 Filed 03/18/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3521Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 57-14 Filed 02/26/18 Page 3 of 3 Page ID
`
` #:1357
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 18th day of March, 2016.
`
`Exhibit M, Page 357
`
`