throbber
Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:315
`
`Exhibit E
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 2 of 11 Page ID #:316
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`Brian Ledahl (CA SB No. 186579)
`Neil A. Rubin (CA SB No. 250761)
`Jacob Buczko (CA SB No. 269408)
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: 310-826-7474
`Facsimile: 310-826-6991
`E-mail: bledahl@raklaw.com
`E-mail: nrubin@raklaw.com
`E-mail: jbuczko@raklaw.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Civil Action No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`v.
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.,
`and SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the
`United States of America, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. in which Document Security Systems,
`Inc. (“DSS” or “Plaintiff”) makes the following allegations against Defendants Seoul
`Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (“Seoul Korea”) and Seoul Semiconductor, Inc. (“Seoul
`America”) (collectively “Seoul” or “Defendants”).
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 93
`
`

`

`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 2 of 10 Page ID #:2Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 3 of 11 Page ID #:317
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`PARTIES
`1.
`Document Security Systems, Inc. is a publicly-traded New York
`corporation. Founded in 1984, DSS is a global leader in brand protection, digital
`security solutions and anti-counterfeiting technologies.
`2.
`In November 2016, DSS acquired a portfolio of patents covering
`technologies used in Light-Emitting Diode (“LED”) lighting products, including the
`patents-in-suit. The patents in this portfolio were originally assigned to Agilent
`Technologies, Inc. and/or the successors of its LED business. Since its recent
`acquisition of these patents, DSS has worked to expand its business efforts regarding
`LED technology. DSS is pursuing both licensing and commercialization of this
`technology acquisition.
`3. On information and belief, Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. is a corporation
`organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Korea with its principal place
`of business at 1B-25, 727, Wonsi- dong, Danwon-gu, Ansan-city, Gyeonggi-do,
`Korea 425-851. Upon information and belief, Seoul Korea manufactures light-
`emitting diode (“LED”) products in Korea and, through its subsidiary, Defendant
`Seoul America, has sales offices in the United States. Defendant Seoul Korea can be
`served with process in Korea pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Service
`Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents, Article 1, November 15, 1965
`T.I.A.S. No. 6638, 20 U.S.T. 361 (U.S. Treaty 1969).
`4. On information and belief, Seoul Semiconductor, Inc. is a California
`corporation with its principal place of business at 1895 Beaver Ridge Circle, Suite G,
`Norcross, Georgia 30071. Upon information and belief, Seoul America sells and/or
`offers for sale nationwide LED products manufactured by Seoul Korea, including in
`the State of California and in this judicial district. Defendant Seoul America can be
`served through its registered agent, Jiyoon Jun, 5856 Corporate Avenue, Suite 240,
`Cypress, California 90630.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`2
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 94
`
`

`

`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 3 of 10 Page ID #:3Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 4 of 11 Page ID #:318
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`5. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the
`United States Code. Accordingly, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28
`U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants in this action because,
`among other reasons, Defendants have committed acts within the Central District of
`California giving rise to this action and have established minimum contacts with the
`forum state of California. Defendants directly and/or through subsidiaries or
`intermediaries (including distributors, retailers, and others), have committed and
`continue to commit acts of infringement in this District by, among other things,
`making, using, importing, offering for sale, and/or selling products and/or services
`that infringe the patents-in-suit. Thus, Defendants have purposefully availed
`themselves of the benefits of doing business in the State of California and the exercise
`of jurisdiction over Defendants would not offend traditional notions of fair play and
`substantial justice.
`7. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 (b)-(c) and 1400(b)
`because Defendants have a regular and established place of business in this District
`and have committed acts of patent infringement in this District. Defendants, for
`example, have a regular and established place of business at 5856 Corporate Ave, No.
`240, Cypress, CA 90630, which is located in Orange County.
`BACKGROUND
`8. DSS is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 6,949,771 (“the
`’771 Patent”) entitled “Light Source.” The ’771 Patent was duly and legally issued by
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 27, 2005. A true and
`correct copy of the ’771 Patent is included as Exhibit A.
`9. DSS is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 7,524,087 (“the
`’087 Patent”) entitled “Optical Device.” The ’087 Patent was duly and legally issued
`by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on April 28, 2009. A true and
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`3
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 95
`
`

`

`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 4 of 10 Page ID #:4Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 5 of 11 Page ID #:319
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`correct copy of the ’087 Patent is included as Exhibit B.
`10. DSS is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 7,256,486
`(“the ’486 Patent”) entitled “Packing Device for Semiconductor Die, Semiconductor
`Device Incorporating Same and Method of Making Same.” The ’486 Patent was duly
`and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on August 14,
`2007. A true and correct copy of the ’486 Patent is included as Exhibit C
`11. DSS owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’771, ‘087 and ‘486
`Patents (collectively, “asserted patents” or “patents-in-suit”), including all rights to
`sue and recover for past and future infringement.
`COUNT I
`INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’771 PATENT
`12. DSS references and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 10 of
`this Complaint.
`13. Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import in the United
`States products and/or services that infringe various claims of the ’771 Patent, and
`continues to do so. By way of illustrative example, Defendants’ infringing products
`include without limitation, all versions and variations, including predecessor and
`successor models, of its T6 Series, and LEDs including the 3020, 3030 (automotive)
`3528, and 5630 (automotive) packages. Defendants’ infringing products also include
`products, e.g., light bulbs, displays and fixtures that contain at least one infringing
`LED product. Defendants’ infringing products are collectively referred to hereinafter
`as “’771 Accused Instrumentalities.”
`14. Defendants have directly infringed and continue to directly infringe the
`’771 Patent by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or
`importing the ’771 Accused Instrumentalities. Such products and/or services are
`covered by one or more claims of the ’771 Patent’s including at least claims 1 to 8
`because they contain each element of those claims.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`4
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 96
`
`

`

`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 5 of 10 Page ID #:5Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 6 of 11 Page ID #:320
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`15. By making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing the ’771
`Accused Instrumentalities infringing the ’771 Patent, Defendants have injured DSS
`and are liable to DSS for infringement of the ’771 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`271(a) directly and/or under the doctrine of equivalents.
`16.
`In addition, Defendants are actively inducing others, such as their
`customers and end users of Accused Instrumentalities, services based thereupon, and
`related products and/or processes, to directly infringe each and every claim limitation,
`including without limitation claims 1 to 8 of the ’771 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C.
`§ 271(b). Defendants’ customers and/or end users have directly infringed and are
`directly infringing each and every claim limitation, including without limitation
`claims 1 to 8 of the ’771 Patent. Defendants have had actual knowledge of the ’771
`Patent at least as of service of this Complaint. Defendants are knowingly inducing
`their customers and/or end users to directly infringe the ’771 Patent, with the specific
`intent to encourage such infringement, and knowing that the induced acts constitute
`patent infringement. Defendants’ inducement includes, for example, providing
`technical guides, product data sheets, demonstrations, software and hardware
`specifications, installation guides, and other forms of support that induce their
`customers and/or end users to directly infringe the ’771 Patent. The ’771 Accused
`Instrumentalities are designed in such a way that when they are used for their intended
`purpose, the user infringes the ’771 Patent. Defendants know and intend that
`customers that purchase the ’771 Accused Instrumentalities will use those products for
`their intended purpose.
`17. Defendants have been aware of the ’771 Patent and of its infringement as
`of a date no later than the date they were served with this Complaint in this action. To
`the extent facts learned in discovery show that Defendants’ infringement of the ’771
`Patent is or has been willful, or to the extent that Defendants’ actions subsequent to
`the filing of this Complaint—such as their behavior as litigants or their failure to take
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`5
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 97
`
`

`

`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 6 of 10 Page ID #:6Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 7 of 11 Page ID #:321
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`remedial actions—render their infringement egregious, DSS reserves the right to
`request such a finding at time of trial.
`18. As a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’771 Patent, DSS has
`suffered monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants’
`infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the
`invention by Defendants, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
`COUNT II
`INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’087 PATENT
`19. DSS references and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 17 of
`this Complaint. Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import in the United
`States products and/or services that infringe various claims of the ’087 Patent, and
`continues to do so. By way of illustrative example, Defendants’ infringing products
`include without limitation, all versions and variations, including predecessor and
`successor models, of its 801 Series (Auto), 802 Series (Auto), 3528, 3528 (white),
`MJT 3528, and 6050 packages. Defendants’ infringing products also include
`products, e.g., light bulbs, displays and fixtures that contain at least one infringing
`LED product. Defendants’ infringing products are collectively referred to hereinafter
`as “’087 Accused Instrumentalities.”
`20. Defendants have directly infringed and continue to directly infringe the
`’087 Patent by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or
`importing the ’087 Accused Instrumentalities. Such products and/or services are
`covered by one or more claims of the ’087 Patent’s including at least claim 1 because
`they contain each element of that claim.
`21. By making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing the ’087
`Accused Instrumentalities infringing the ’087 Patent, Defendants have injured DSS
`and are liable to DSS for infringement of the ’087 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`271(a) directly and/or under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`6
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 98
`
`

`

`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 7 of 10 Page ID #:7Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 8 of 11 Page ID #:322
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`22.
`In addition, Defendants are actively inducing others, such as their
`customers and end users of Accused Instrumentalities, services based thereupon, and
`related products and/or processes, to directly infringe each and every claim limitation,
`including without limitation claim 1 of the ’087 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. §
`271(b). Defendants’ customers and/or end users have directly infringed and are
`directly infringing each and every claim limitation, including without limitation claim
`1 of the ’087 Patent. Defendants have had actual knowledge of the ’087 Patent at
`least as of service of this Complaint. Defendants are knowingly inducing their
`customers and/or end users to directly infringe the ’087 Patent, with the specific intent
`to encourage such infringement, and knowing that the induced acts constitute patent
`infringement. Defendants’ inducement includes, for example, providing technical
`guides, product data sheets, demonstrations, software and hardware specifications,
`installation guides, and other forms of support that induce their customers and/or end
`users to directly infringe the ’087 Patent. The ’087 Accused Instrumentalities are
`designed in such a way that when they are used for their intended purpose, the user
`infringes the ’087 Patent. Defendants know and intend that customers that purchase
`the ’087 Accused Instrumentalities will use those products for their intended purpose.
`23. Defendants have been aware of the ’087 Patent and of its infringement as
`of a date no later than the date they were served with this Complaint in this action. To
`the extent facts learned in discovery show that Defendants’ infringement of the ’087
`Patent is or has been willful, or to the extent that Defendants’ actions subsequent to
`the filing of this Complaint—such as their behavior as litigants or their failure to take
`remedial actions—render their infringement egregious, DSS reserves the right to
`request such a finding at time of trial.
`24. As a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’087 Patent, DSS has
`suffered monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants’
`infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the
`invention by Defendants, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`7
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 99
`
`

`

`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 8 of 10 Page ID #:8Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 9 of 11 Page ID #:323
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`COUNT III
`INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’486 PATENT
`25. DSS references and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 24 of
`this Complaint.
`26. On information and belief, Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell,
`and/or import in the United States products and/or services that infringe various
`claims of the ’486 Patent, and continues to do so. By way of illustrative example,
`Defendants’ infringing products include without limitation, all versions and variations,
`including predecessor and successor models, of its ZPower LED – Z5M, Z5M0,
`Z5M1, Z5M2, Z5P, Z5, Z7, Z7-F, Z6, and P5 II LED products. Defendants’ infringing
`products also include products, e.g., light bulbs, displays and fixtures that contain at
`least one infringing LED product. Defendants’ infringing products are collectively
`referred to hereinafter as “’486 Accused Instrumentalities.”
`27. On information and belief, Defendants have directly infringed and
`continues to directly infringe the ’486 Patent by, among other things, making, using,
`offering for sale, selling, and/or importing the ’486 Accused Instrumentalities. On
`information and belief, such products are covered by one or more claims of the ’486
`Patent including at least claim 1 because they contain each element of that claim.
`28. By making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing the ’486
`Accused Instrumentalities infringing the ’486 Patent, Defendants have injured DSS
`and is liable to DSS for infringement of the ’486 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(a)
`directly and/or under the doctrine of equivalents.
`29.
`In addition, Defendants are actively inducing others, such as their
`customers and end users of Accused Instrumentalities, services based thereupon, and
`related products and/or processes, to directly infringe each and every claim limitation,
`including without limitation claim 1 of the ‘486 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. §
`271(b). Defendants’ customers and/or end users have directly infringed and are
`directly infringing each and every claim limitation, including without limitation claim
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`8
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 100
`
`

`

`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 9 of 10 Page ID #:9Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 10 of 11 Page ID
` #:324
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1 of the ‘486 Patent. Defendants have had actual knowledge of the ‘486 Patent at
`least as of service of this Complaint. Defendants are knowingly inducing their
`customers and/or end users to directly infringe the ‘486 Patent, with the specific intent
`to encourage such infringement, and knowing that the induced acts constitute patent
`infringement. Defendants’ inducement includes, for example, providing technical
`guides, product data sheets, demonstrations, software and hardware specifications,
`installation guides, and other forms of support that induce their customers and/or end
`users to directly infringe the ‘486 Patent. The ’087 Accused Instrumentalities are
`designed in such a way that when they are used for their intended purpose, the user
`infringes the ‘486 Patent. Defendants know and intend that customers that purchase
`the ‘486 Accused Instrumentalities will use those products for their intended purpose.
`30. Defendants have been aware of the ‘486 Patent and of its infringement as
`of a date no later than the date they were served with this Complaint in this action. To
`the extent facts learned in discovery show that Defendants’ infringement of the ‘486
`Patent is or has been willful, or to the extent that Defendants’ actions subsequent to
`the filing of this Complaint—such as their behavior as litigants or their failure to take
`remedial actions—render their infringement egregious, DSS reserves the right to
`request such a finding at time of trial.
`31. As a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ‘486 Patent, DSS has
`suffered monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants’
`infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the
`invention by Defendants, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`Plaintiff respectfully requests the following relief from this Court:
`A. A judgment that Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the
`’771, ’087 and ‘486 Patents;
`B. A judgment and order requiring Defendants to pay DSS its damages,
`costs, expenses, and prejudgment and post-judgment interest for Defendants’ acts of
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`9
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 101
`
`

`

`
`Case 8:17-cv-00981 Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 10 of 10 Page ID #:10Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 23-7 Filed 08/29/17 Page 11 of 11 Page ID
` #:325
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`infringement in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`C. A judgment and order requiring Defendants to provide accountings and
`to pay supplemental damages to DSS, including, without limitation, prejudgment and
`post-judgment interest;
`D. A judgment and order finding that this is an exceptional case within the
`meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285 and awarding to DSS its reasonable attorneys’ fees
`against Defendants; and
`E. Any and all other relief to which DSS may show itself to be entitled.
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, DSS requests a
`trial by jury of any issues so triable by right.
`
`
`Dated: June 7, 2017
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`Brian Ledahl
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`Brian Ledahl (CA SB No. 186579)
`Neil A. Rubin (CA SB No. 250761)
`Jacob Buczko (CA SB No. 269408)
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: 310-826-7474
`Facsimile: 310-826-6991
`E-mail: bledahl@raklaw.com
`E-mail: nrubin@raklaw.com
`E-mail: jbuczko@raklaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff,
`Document Security Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`10
`
`Case No. 8:17-cv-00981
`
`Exhibit E
`
`Page 102
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket