throbber
Case 2:22-cv-08050-CJC-JDE Document 32-2 Filed 05/22/23 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:398
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Gregory Dovel (SBN 135387)
`Email: greg@dovel.com
`Richard Lyon (SBN 229288)
`Email: rick@dovel.com
`DOVEL & LUNER, LLP
`201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600
`Santa Monica, CA 90401
`Telephone: 1.310.656.7066
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`
`Alexis Adian Smith (SBN 274429)
`asmith@jonesday.com
`JONES DAY
`555 South Flower Street
`Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: +1.213.489.3939
`Facsimile: +1.213.243.2539
`Attorneys for Defendant
`HIKVISION USA, INC.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HIKVISION USA, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:22-CV-08050 CJC(JDEx)
`
`AMENDED DECLARATION OF
`RICHARD LYON IN SUPPORT OF
`JOINT AND UNOPPOSED
`MOTION TO CONTINUE THE
`HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S
`PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS
`AND CORRESPONDING REPLY
`BRIEF
`
`Judge: Hon. Cormac J. Carney
`
`
`
`
`Amended Declaration of Richard Lyon in
`Support of Joint and Unopposed Motion to
`Continue Hearing
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:22-CV-08050 CJC (JDEx)
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08050-CJC-JDE Document 32-2 Filed 05/22/23 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:399
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Richard Lyon, declare as follows:
`
`
`
`1.
`
` I am a partner at the law firm of Dovel & Luner, counsel for Plaintiff
`
`Network-1 Technologies. I submit this declaration in support of the joint and
`
`unopposed Motion to Continue the hearing on Defendant’s Partial Motion to
`
`Dismiss and corresponding Reply Brief, filed herewith. I know the facts stated
`
`herein to be true based upon my own personal knowledge or upon my review of the
`
`records and files Dovel & Luner maintains in the regular course of its
`
`representation of the plaintiff. If called and sworn as a witness, I could and would
`
`testify competently thereto.
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Good cause exists to continue the hearing and deadline. This morning,
`
`the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the case. Continuing the
`
`dates will allow the parties to conserve resources and draft a settlement agreement
`
`over the next three weeks.
`
`
`
`3. On May 22, 2023, Plaintiff’s counsel and counsel for Hikvision USA,
`
`Inc. consented to this motion.
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`
`America that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on May 22, 2023 at Santa Monica, California
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Richard Lyon
`Richard Lyon
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Amended Declaration of Richard Lyon in
`Support of Joint and Unopposed Motion to
`Continue Hearing
`
`
`1
`
`Case No. 2:22-CV-08050 CJC (JDEx)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket