`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`HIKVISION USA, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 2:22-CV-08050 CJC(JDEx)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`HIKVISION USA, INC.’S PARTIAL
`MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER
`FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6)
`Judge: Hon. Cormac J. Carney
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Order Granting Partial Motion to Dismiss
`Case No. 2:22-CV-08050 CJC (JDEx)
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-08050-CJC-JDE Document 27-1 Filed 05/04/23 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:359
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`
`
`Having considered the parties’ papers filed in connection with Defendant
`Hikvision USA, Inc.’s (“Hikvision’s”) Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Network-
`1 Technologies, Inc.’s (“Network-1’s”) Amended Complaint for patent
`infringement (Dkt. 25) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for
`failure to state a claim for: (1) indirect infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,218,930
`(“’930 Patent”) and (2) willful infringement of the ’930 Patent, such further
`evidence and arguments of counsel for the parties in connection therewith, if any,
`and finding good cause therefore, this Court HEREBY GRANTS Hikvision’s
`motion in its entirety.
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Network-1’s claims for indirect
`infringement and for willful infringement are dismissed with prejudice.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hon. Cormac J. Carney
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`Order Granting Partial Motion to Dismiss
`Case No. 2:22-CV-08050 CJC (JDEx)
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
