`
`#:77835
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No. 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC
`NANTWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company, and
`
`NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC, a
`Hon. George H. Wu
`Delaware limited liability company,
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`
`DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED
`Plaintiffs,
`APPLICATION TO FILE
`
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`vs.
`REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND
`
`AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
`BANK OF AMERICA
`IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’
`CORPORATION, a Delaware
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN
`corporation, and BANK OF
`DAMAGES-RELATED OPINIONS OF
`AMERICA, N.A., a national banking
`DAN SCHONFELD, PH.D. AND
`association,
`PATRICK KENNEDY, PH.D.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`1
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN
`DAMAGES-RELATED OPINIONS OF DAN SCHONFELD, PH.D. AND PATRICK KENNEDY, PH.D.
`CASE NO. 2:20-CV-07872-GW-PVC
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 587-1 Filed 07/11/24 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
`
`#:77836
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Upon consideration of the Defendants BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
`and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Unopposed
`Application to File Under Seal Regarding Supplemental and Amended Memorandum
`of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Certain Damages-Related
`Opinions of Dan Schonfeld, Ph.D. and Patrick Kennedy, Ph.D. (the “Memorandum”),
`and for good cause shown, the Court hereby rules as follows:
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Unopposed Application to File
`Under Seal Regarding the Memorandum is GRANTED and the following documents
`and portions of documents may be filed under seal.
`Document Description
`Nature of Information to be Sealed
`Designated by Defendants as “HIGHLY
`Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of E.
`CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`Danielle T. Williams in Support of
`ONLY” under the parties’ stipulated protective
`the Memorandum: Excerpts of the
`order (Dkt. No. 210). Plaintiffs do not oppose
`Deposition of Patrick Kennedy,
`sealing this document in its entirety.
`Ph.D. dated April 5, 2024.
`Designated by Defendants in its entirety as
`Supplemental and Amended
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`Memorandum of Law in Support
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the
`of Defendants’ Motion to Exclude
`parties’ stipulated protective order (Dkt.
`Certain Damages-Related
`No. 210). Plaintiffs do not oppose sealing this
`Opinions of Dan Schonfeld, Ph.D.
`Memorandum in its entirety.
`and Patrick Kennedy, Ph.D.
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED: ________________
`
`
`By
`
`
`Honorable George H. Wu
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN
`DAMAGES-RELATED OPINIONS OF DAN SCHONFELD, PH.D. AND PATRICK KENNEDY, PH.D.
`CASE NO. 2:20-CV-07872-GW-PVC
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
