`
`#:59496
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No. 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC
`NANTWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company, and
`
`NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC, a
`Hon. George H. Wu
`Delaware limited liability company,
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`
`DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED
`Plaintiffs,
`APPLICATION TO FILE
`
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`vs.
`REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ REPLY
`
`IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO
`BANK OF AMERICA
`EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS OF
`CORPORATION, a Delaware
`DAN SCHONFELD, PH.D.
`corporation, and BANK OF
`
`AMERICA, N.A., a national banking
`association,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`1
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL REGARDING
`DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS OF DAN SCHONFELD, PH.D.
`CASE NO. 2:20-CV-07872-GW-PVC
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 472-1 Filed 05/23/24 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
`
`#:59497
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Upon consideration of the Defendants BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
`and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Unopposed
`Application to File Documents Under Seal Regarding Defendants’ Reply in Support of
`Their Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Dan Schonfeld, Ph.D. (the “Reply”), and
`for good cause shown, the Court hereby rules as follows:
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Application to File Under Seal
`Regarding Defendants’ Reply in Support of Their Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions
`of Dan Schonfeld, Ph.D. is GRANTED, and the following documents and portions of
`documents may be filed under seal.
`Document Description
`Redactions to the Reply.
`
`Nature of Information to be Sealed
`Contains or references information
`designated by Defendants and Mitek as
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the
`parties’ stipulated protective order (Dkt.
`No. 210). Plaintiffs and Mitek do not
`oppose redacting portions of this
`document.
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`DATED: ________________
`
`
`By
`
`
`Honorable George H. Wu
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL REGARDING
`DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS OF DAN SCHONFELD, PH.D.
`CASE NO. 2:20-CV-07872-GW-PVC
`
`