George C. Lombardi (pro hac vice)
`glombardi@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601-9703
`Telephone: (312) 558-5600
`Facsimile:
`(312) 558-5700
`
`E. Danielle T. Williams (pro hac vice)
`dwilliams@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`300 South Tryon Street, 16th Floor
`Charlotte, NC 28202
`Telephone: (704) 350-7700
`Facsimile:
`(704) 350-7800
`
`
`Dustin J. Edwards (pro hac vice)
`dedwards@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`800 Capitol St., Suite 2400
`Houston, TX 77002-2925
`Telephone: (713) 651-2600
`Facsimile:
`(713) 651-2700
`
`Diana Hughes Leiden (SBN: 267606)
`dhleiden@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 S. Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
`Telephone: (213) 615-1700
`Facsimile:
`(213) 615-1750
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
`and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 470 Filed 05/23/24 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:59483
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC
`
`DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT
`OF THEIR MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`CERTAIN OPINIONS OF DAN
`SCHONFELD, PH. D.
`
`Date: June 6, 2024
`Time: 8:30 am
`Courtroom: 9D
`
`Judge: Honorable George H. Wu
`
`
`NANTWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company, and NANT
`HOLDINGS IP, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`
`AMERICA
`OF
`BANK
`a
`Delaware
`CORPORATION,
`BANK
`OF
`corporation,
`and
`AMERICA, N.A., a national banking
`association,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`PUBLIC/REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT PROPOSED TO BE FILED
`UNDER SEAL IN ITS ENTIRETY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Page
`
`INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1
`I.
`ARGUMENT........................................................................................................ 1
`II.
`A. Dr. Schonfeld’s Narrative is improper expert testimony and would not be
`helpful to the jury. ....................................................................................................... 1
`B. Dr. Schonfeld’s Opinions Contradict This Court’s Claim Construction. ............ 4
`1.
`The Characteristics Terms are Limited to Non-Symbolic
`Visual Features. ............................................................................... 6
`Bank of America Applies This Court’s Claim Construction
`as Ordered. ....................................................................................... 8
`Dr. Schonfeld Does Not Apply This Court’s Claim
`Constructions. ................................................................................ 11
`C. Dr. Schonfeld’s Technical Comparability and Secondary Considerations
`Opinions Are Unsupported and Conclusory. ............................................................ 12
`D. Dr. Schonfeld Offers No Support for His Opinion that the Versions of the
`Accused Products that He Analyzed Were Representative of Any Other Versions.14
`E. Dr. Schonfeld Offered New and Conclusory Opinions Regarding the
`“Recognize” Limitations in His Deposition. ............................................................ 18
`III. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 20
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 470 Filed 05/23/24 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:59484
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-1-
`DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS OF DAN SCHONFELD, PH. D.
`CASE NO. 2:20-CV-07872-GW-PVC
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`
` Page(s)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 470 Filed 05/23/24 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:59485
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases
`Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc.,
`2017 WL 3007464 (E.D. Tex. July 14, 2017) .............................................. 13, 15
`Application of Nomiya,
`509 F.2d 566 (C.C.P.A. 1975) .............................................................................. 5
`Complete Ent. Res. LLC v. Live Nation Ent. Inc.,
`2017 WL 11632203 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2017) .................................................. 12
`Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
`575 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2009) ............................................................................ 5
`Fontem Ventures, B.V. v. NJOY, Inc.,
`2015 WL 12743861 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2015) .................................................... 2
`Guangzhou Yucheng Trading Co. v. Dbest Prods., Inc.,
`644 F. Supp. 3d 637 (C.D. Cal. 2022) .................................................................. 4
`Harrington v. Dugar,
`2024 WL 590682 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024) ........................................................... 3
`Herrera v. Eli Lilly & Co.,
`2015 WL 12743696 (C.D. Cal. July 31, 2015) ................................................ 3,4
`ICU Med., Inc. v. Alaris Med. Sys., Inc.,
`2007 WL 8081360 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2007) ....................................................... 4
`Koger v. Costco Wholesale Corp.,
`2023 WL 8188842 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2023) ..................................................... 2
`MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.,
`2014 WL 2859280 (N.D. Cal. June 20, 2014) .................................................. 19
`Multimedia Pat. Tr. v. Apple Inc.,
`2012 WL 6863471 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012) ...................................................... 15
`Openwave Sys., Inc. v. Apple Inc.,
`808 F.3d 509 (Fed. Cir. 2015) .............................................................................. 5
`
`-2-
`DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS OF DAN SCHONFELD, PH. D.
`CASE NO. 2:20-CV-07872-GW-PVC
`
`
`
`
`
`