throbber
Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:41092
`
`Dustin J. Edwards (pro hac vice)
`dedwards@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`800 Capitol St., Suite 2400
`Houston, TX 77002-2925
`Telephone: (713) 651-2600
`Facsimile:
`(713) 651-2700
`Diana Hughes Leiden (SBN: 267606)
`dhleiden@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 S. Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
`Telephone: (213) 615-1700
`Facsimile:
`(213) 615-1750
`
`George C. Lombardi (pro hac vice)
`glombardi@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601-9703
`Telephone: (312) 558-5600
`Facsimile:
`(312) 558-5700
`E. Danielle T. Williams (pro hac vice)
`dwilliams@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`300 South Tryon Street, 16th Floor
`Charlotte, NC 28202
`Telephone: (704) 350-7700
`Facsimile:
`(704) 350-7800
`Michael S. Elkin (pro hac vice)
`melkin@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone: (212) 294-6700
`Facsimile: (212) 294-4700
`Attorneys for Defendants
`BANK OF AMERICA
`CORPORATION
`and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No. 2:20-CV-7872-GW-PVC
`NantWorks, LLC, a Delaware limited
`liability company, and NANT
`HOLDINGS IP, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`BANK OF AMERICA
`CORPORATION, a Delaware
`corporation, and BANK OF AMERICA,
`N.A., a national banking association,
`Defendants.
`
`DEFENDANTS’ CORRECTED
`UNOPPOSED APPLICATION TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`RELATED TO DEFEDANTS’
`MOTION FOR PARTIAL
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
`FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 35
`U.S.C. § 287(a)
`Local Rule 79-5.2.2(b)
`[Filed concurrently with Declaration of
`Danielle Williams and Proposed
`Order]
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 2 of 10 Page ID #:41093
`
`TO THE COURT, PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.2.2.(b),
`Defendants Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A. (collectively,
`“Defendants” or “Bank of America”), hereby request that this Court enter an order
`permitting them to file under seal the materials described below that are filed in
`connection with Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding
`Plaintiffs’ Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. § 287(a).
`Document Description
`Nature of Information to be Sealed
`Designated by Plaintiffs as “CONTAINS
`NantWorks’s Corrected Third
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`Supplemental Responses and Objections
`INFORMATION SUBJECT TO
`to Defendants’ Third Set of
`PROTECTIVE ORDER” under the
`Interrogatories
`parties’ stipulated protective orders (Dkt.
`Nos. 102, 210), and contains references
`to documents and deposition testimony
`designated by Bank of America as
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Plaintiffs do not oppose sealing this
`exhibit in its entirety.
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Bank of
`America and Plaintiffs as “CONTAINS
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION SUBJECT TO
`PROTECTIVE ORDER” under the
`parties’ stipulated protective orders (Dkt.
`
`Excerpts from the Deposition of Orang
`Dialameh
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`1
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 3 of 10 Page ID #:41094
`
`
`Document Description
`
`NANT_BOA00150428
`
`NANT_BOA00125087
`
`BOFA00064630
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Nature of Information to be Sealed
`Nos. 102, 210), and “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Plaintiffs as
`“CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Plaintiffs as
`“CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Bank of
`America as “CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`
`
`
`2
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 4 of 10 Page ID #:41095
`
`
`Document Description
`
`Excerpts from the Deposition of
`Matthew Calman
`
`NANT_BOA001100555
`
`Excerpts from the Deposition of Eric
`Gray
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Nature of Information to be Sealed
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Bank of
`America and Plaintiffs as “CONTAINS
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION SUBJECT TO
`PROTECTIVE ORDER” under the
`parties’ stipulated protective orders (Dkt.
`Nos. 102, 210), and “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Plaintiffs as
`“CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Bank of
`America and Plaintiffs as “CONTAINS
`
`
`
`3
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 5 of 10 Page ID #:41096
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Document Description
`
`BOFA00034102
`
`Excerpts from the Deposition of Mark
`Kokes
`
`Nature of Information to be Sealed
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION SUBJECT TO
`PROTECTIVE ORDER” under the
`parties’ stipulated protective orders (Dkt.
`Nos. 102, 210), and “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Bank of
`America as “CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Bank of
`America and Plaintiffs as “CONTAINS
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION SUBJECT TO
`PROTECTIVE ORDER” under the
`parties’ stipulated protective orders (Dkt.
`Nos. 102, 210), and “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY.”
`
`
`
`4
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 6 of 10 Page ID #:41097
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Document Description
`BOFA00912293
`
`The Declaration of Jim Storer, which
`attaches as Exhibit A, a true and correct
`copy of the March 19, 2024 Expert
`Report of James Storer, Ph.D.
`
`NANT_BOA00000026
`
`Nature of Information to be Sealed
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Bank of
`America as “CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Bank of
`America as “CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Plaintiffs as
`“CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`
`
`5
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 7 of 10 Page ID #:41098
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Document Description
`
`BOA00075345
`
`Statement of Uncontroverted Facts in
`Support of Defendants’ Motion for
`Summary Judgment Regarding
`Plaintiffs’ Failure to Comply with 35
`U.S.C. § 287(a)
`
`Memorandum in Support of Defendants’
`Motion for Summary Judgment
`Regarding Plaintiffs’ Failure to Comply
`with 35 U.S.C. § 287(a)
`
`Nature of Information to be Sealed
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Bank of
`America as “CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Plaintiffs as
`“CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`Contains references and excerpts to
`documents designated by Plaintiffs as
`“CONTAINS HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
`under the parties’ stipulated protective
`orders (Dkt. Nos. 102, 210), and
`
`
`
`6
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 8 of 10 Page ID #:41099
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Document Description
`
`Nature of Information to be Sealed
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`
`I.
`
`Background
`As set forth in the Declaration of Danielle Williams in Support of Plaintiffs’
`Application to File Under Seal submitted herewith, Defendants make this application
`because the foregoing documents are marked and designated as “Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys Eyes Only” and/or “Highly Confidential” as follows pursuant to the parties’
`Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. No. 210). See Declaration of Danielle Williams (the
`“Williams Decl.”), ¶ 17. Defendants make this application because the materials
`referenced above contain information that is “Highly Confidential – Attorneys Eyes
`Only” and/or “Highly Confidential” of Bank of America. As required by Local Rule
`79-5.2.2(b), counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendants conferred about Defendants’ filing
`these materials to limit, if not entirely avoid, the necessity of this Application. Id., ¶¶ 2,
`17. Plaintiffs’ counsel does not oppose filing the entirety of these materials under seal.
`The Williams Declaration sets forth the information Defendants seek to file under
`seal, the basis for the Application, and good cause to seal Bank of America confidential
`information. Id., ¶¶ 2, 17-18. Due to the sensitive nature of the information in the
`foregoing materials, good cause exists to approve Bank of America’s application to file
`these materials under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.2.2(a).
`II. Good Cause Exists to File Materials Under Seal
`The decision to seal records is left to the discretion of the District Court.
`Hagestad v. Tragesser, 49 F.3d 1430, 1434 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Nixon v. Warner
`Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978)). Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal
`Rules of Civil Procedure allows parties, upon a showing of “good cause,” to file under
`seal documents containing “confidential . . . commercial information.” See also IMAX
`Corp. v. Cinematech, Inc., 152 F.3d 1161, 1168 n.9 (9th Cir. 1998) (noting that
`
`
`
`7
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 9 of 10 Page ID #:41100
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`confidential and proprietary business information is “to be filed under seal.”); Sun
`Microsystems Inc. v. Network Appliance, No. C-08-01641 EDL, 2009 WL 5125817, at
`*9 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2009) (granting sealing requests because the documents “contain
`confidential [business] information, much of which has been designated as Confidential
`or Highly Confidential under the parties’ stipulated protective order, that could cause
`competitive harm if disclosed.”); In re Adobe Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation Master
`File, 141 F.R.D. 155, 161-162 (N.D. Cal. 1992) (“Protective orders and filings under
`seal are the primary means by which the courts ensure full disclosure of relevant
`information, while still preserving the parties’ (and third parties’) legitimate expectation
`that confidential business information, proprietary technology and trade secrets will not
`be publicly disseminated.”).
`Bank of America respectfully requests that the Court grant its application to file
`under seal the foregoing materials on the grounds that the foregoing materials contain
`Bank of America’s confidential commercial information, specifically, non-public,
`proprietary details about the design and functionality of Bank of America’s mobile
`check deposit, which has been designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys Eyes
`Only” and/or “Highly Confidential.” Williams Decl., ¶ 17. Accordingly, Bank of
`America has an important interest in maintaining the confidentiality of this information,
`and any public interest in its disclosure is rebutted. See, e.g., Kamakana v. City & Cnty.
`of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006) (differentiating dispositive motions
`by explaining that, for such motions, “the private interests of the litigants are not the
`only weights on the scale”). If such information were made public, competitors of Bank
`of America would gain access to Bank of America’s business practices regarding its
`product development and technical details regarding the design and functionality of its
`products. Williams Decl., ¶ 17. Bank of America does not share this type of information
`publicly because it could significantly harm Bank of America’s competitive standing.
`Id.
`
`Accordingly, Defendants respectfully request that the Court grant the Application
`
`
`
`8
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 370 Filed 05/06/24 Page 10 of 10 Page ID
`
`#:41101
`
`to File the aforementioned documents under seal.
`
`Dated: May 6, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`
`
`By:/s/ E. Danielle T. Williams
`George C. Lombardi (pro hac vice)
`Michael S. Elkin (pro hac vice)
`E. Danielle T. Williams (pro hac vice)
`Dustin J. Edwards (pro hac vice)
`Diana Hughes Leiden
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
`and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket