`#:10588
`
`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`James R. Asperger (Bar No. 83188)
`jimasperger@quinnemanuel.com
`Rachael McCracken
`rachaelmccracken@quinnemanuel.com
`865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543
`Telephone: (213) 443-3000
`Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Todd M. Briggs (Bar No. 209282)
`toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com
`Brice C. Lynch (Bar No. 288567)
`bricelynch@quinnemanuel.com
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, California 94065
`Telephone: (650) 801-5000
`Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`Eric Huang (pro hac vice)
`erichuang@quinnemanuel.com
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`Telephone: (212) 849-7000
`Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`NANTWORKS, LLC and NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`NANTWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company, and NANT
`HOLDINGS IP, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`CORPORATION, a Delaware
`corporation, and BANK OF
`AMERICA, N.A., a national banking
`association,
`
`
`vs.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`NANTWORKS’ MOTION TO
`STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE
`EXPERT REPORT OF DR.
`NATHANIEL POLISH
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NANTWORKS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF
`THE EXPERT REPORT OF DR. NATHANIEL POLISH
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 298-10 Filed 03/09/24 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
`
`#:10589
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
`
`Having considered the papers, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs NantWorks LLC
`
`and Nant Holding IP, LLC’s (“NantWorks”) Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert
`
`Report of Dr. Nathaniel Polish Regarding Invalidity of Patents-in-Suit (“Polish
`
`Report”). The Court hereby strikes the following from the Polish Report:
` Paragraphs 201-213.
`
` Paragraphs 292-294, 297, 299-304, 320, 381-382, 384, 386, 388-390, 400,
`440, 461, 559, 561-562, 565-569, 666-669, 672-675, 679, 693, 698-699, 704-
`707, 709, 716, 779-784, 787-788, 795, 838-840, 842, 848, 889-891, 893, 896-
`900, 907, 1019.
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED: _________, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:____________________________
`Honorable George H. Wu
`United States District Court Judge
`
`1
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NANTWORKS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF
`THE EXPERT REPORT OF DR. NATHANIEL POLISH
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`