`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
`
`
`Date: March 8, 2024
`
`Case No. CV 20-7872 GW (PVCx)
`Title
`Nantworks LLC v. Bank of America Corp
`
`
`
`
`Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`Marlene Ramirez
`Deputy Clerk
`
`
`Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
`None
`
`None
`Court Reporter / Recorder
`
`Attorneys Present for Defendant:
`None
`
`
`PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
`PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
`PORTIONS OF THE EXPERT REPORT OF DR.
`NATHANIEL POLISH (DKT. NO. 294)
`
`On March 7, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Motion To Strike Portions of the Expert Report
`
`of Dr. Nathaniel Polish and set it for hearing on April 11, 2024, before District Judge Wu.
`(“Motion,” Dkt. No. 294).1 The Motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate
`Judge. (See Dkt. No. 8) (“District judges in the Central District of California refer all
`discovery-related motions to the assigned magistrate judge pursuant to General Order No.
`05-07. Discovery-related motions should be noticed for hearing before the assigned
`magistrate judge.”).
`
`The Motion fails to comply with the Local Rules, which require all discovery
`
`motions to be filed in the form of a Joint Stipulation. L.R. 37. “The Court will not
`consider any discovery motion in the absence of a joint stipulation or a declaration from
`counsel for the moving party establishing that opposing counsel (a) failed to confer in a
`
`
`1 Plaintiff also filed an Application to file certain documents under seal (“Application,”
`Dkt. No. 295), along with a Sealed Declaration of Brice C. Lynch in support of the
`Application) and attached sealed exhibits (Dkt. No. 296).
`
`CV-90 (03/15)
`
`Civil Minutes – General
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 297 Filed 03/08/24 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:8015
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
`
`
`Date: March 8, 2024
`
`Case No. CV 20-7872 GW (PVCx)
`Title
`Nantworks LLC v. Bank of America Corp
`
`
`timely manner under L.R. 37-1; (b) failed to provide the opposing party’s portion of the
`joint stipulation in a timely manner under L.R. 37-2.2; or (c) refused to sign and return
`the joint stipulation after the opposing party’s portion was added.” L.R. 37-2.4.
`Plaintiff’s counsel does not assert that opposing counsel failed to participate in the Local
`Rule 37 procedures.
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion To Strike Portions of the Expert Report of Dr. Nathaniel Polish
`(Dkt. No. 294) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The April 11, 2024, hearing is
`VACATED. The Application to file certain documents under seal (Dkt. No. 295) is
`DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is ordered to strike the Sealed Declaration (Dkt. No.
`296) from the docket.
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CV-90 (03/15)
`
`Initials of Preparer
`
`00:00
`mr
`
`Civil Minutes – General
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
