`
`
`
`
`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No.
`177129)
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Todd M. Briggs (Bar No. 209282)
`toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, California 94065
`Telephone: (650) 801-5000
`Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`Eric Huang (pro hac vice)
`erichuang@quinnemanuel.com
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`Telephone: (212) 849-7000
`Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`NANTWORKS, LLC and NANT
`HOLDINGS IP, LLC
`
`George C. Lombardi (pro hac vice)
`glombardi@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601-9703
`Telephone: (312) 558-5600
`Facsimile: (312) 558-5700
`
`E. Danielle T. Williams (pro hac vice)
`dwilliams@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`300 South Tryon Street, 16th Floor
`Charlotte, NC 28202
`Telephone: (704) 350-7700
`Facsimile: (704) 350-7800
`
`Diana Hughes Leiden (SBN: 267606)
`dhleiden@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 S. Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
`Telephone: (213) 615-1700
`Facsimile: (213) 615-1750
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
`and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NANTWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company, and NANT
`HOLDINGS IP, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`CORPORATION, a Delaware
`corporation, and BANK OF
`AMERICA, N.A., a national banking
`association,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`
`STIPULATED MOTION TO
`DISMISS COUNTS VI, X & XI OF
`THE FIRST AMENDED
`COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
`AND COUNTS X & XI OF
`DEFENDANTS’
`COUNTERCLAIMS WITHOUT
`PREJUDICE
`
`Hon. George H. Wu
`
`
`
`
`07553-00012/14646061.3
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 292 Filed 01/25/24 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:4832
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
` Plaintiffs Nantworks, LLC, and Nant Holdings IP, LLC (collectively,
`
`2
`
`“Plaintiffs” or “NantWorks”) and Defendants Bank of America Corporation and Bank
`
`3
`
`of America, N.A. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Bank of America”) (together, “the
`
`4
`
`“Parties”) submit this Stipulated Motion to Dismiss as follows:
`
`5
`
`1.
`
`On November 11, 2020, NantWorks filed its First Amended Complaint,
`
`6
`
`asserting counts for infringement of eight patents in suit (Counts I through VIII),
`
`7
`
`copyright infringement (Count IX), violation of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (Count
`
`8
`
`X), misappropriation of trade secrets under California law (Count XI), and breach of
`
`9
`
`contract under New York and California law (Count XII). Dkt. 40.
`
`10
`
`2.
`
`In the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), NantWorks specifically
`
`11
`
`accused Bank of America of infringing U.S. Patent No. 8,520,897 (the “’897 patent”),
`
`12
`
`among other claims. Dkt. 40, (FAC) Count VI. Bank of America counterclaimed
`
`13
`
`for declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of the ’897 Patent. Dkt.
`
`14
`
`99 (Bank of America’s Answer to First Amended Complaint, Affirmative Defenses,
`
`15
`
`and Counterclaims), Counts XI and XII.
`
`16
`
`3.
`
`Count IX was dismissed without prejudice on March 11, 2021. Dkt.
`
`17
`
`98. Counts III and IV of the Amended Complaint for patent infringement (and the
`
`18
`
`corresponding counterclaims) were dismissed with prejudice by stipulation on
`
`19
`
`February 3 & 9, 2022. Dkt. 166, 171.
`
`20
`
`4.
`
`To streamline the issues for litigation, avoid uncertainty, and halt the
`
`21
`
`substantial and continuing expense and burden in this ongoing litigation, dismissal is
`
`22
`
`appropriate for the Parties’ claims related to the ’897 Patent and for NantWorks’
`
`23
`
`claims in Counts X and XI of the First Amended Complaint.
`
`24
`
`5.
`
`NantWorks therefore stipulates that its allegations of infringement
`
`25
`
`relating to the ’897 Patent (including Count VI of its First Amended Complaint), and
`
`26
`
`associated claims for damages, are dismissed with prejudice.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`07553-00012/14646061.3
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 292 Filed 01/25/24 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:4833
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`6.
`
`NantWorks also stipulates that its causes of action for Violation of the
`
`2
`
`Defend Trade Secrets Act, Count X, and for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets under
`
`3
`
`California Law, Count XI, are dismissed with prejudice.
`
`4
`
`7.
`
`Bank of America stipulates that its counterclaims for declaratory
`
`5
`
`judgment of non-infringement, Count XI, and for declaratory judgment of invalidity
`
`6
`
`of the ’897 patent, Count XII, are dismissed with prejudice.
`
`7
`
`8.
`
`NantWorks further stipulates as follows: NantWorks, LLC and Nant
`
`8
`
`Holdings IP, LLC hereby represent and warrant that they own all right, title, and
`
`9
`
`interest in the ’897 Patent. Nantworks, LLC and Nant Holdings IP, LLC hereby
`
`10
`
`agree and covenant not to sue or otherwise bring any demand, claim, lawsuit, or action
`
`11
`
`against Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A, and each of their
`
`12
`
`respective past, present, and future parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates,
`
`13
`
`predecessors, successors, and assigns, and present, former, and future officers,
`
`14
`
`directors, managers, members, employees, agents, third-party administrators,
`
`15
`
`attorneys, advisors, consultants, indemnitors, insurers, and heirs, for infringement,
`
`16
`
`now or in the future, of the ’897 Patent. For avoidance of doubt, this covenant not to
`
`17
`
`sue for infringement of the ’897 Patent also applies to (i) Bank of America’s
`
`18
`
`customers for use of its products and services; and (ii) third party vendors within the
`
`19
`
`limited respect to products and services actually provided by the third party vendors
`
`20
`
`to or on behalf of Bank of America for use by Bank of America and/or Bank of
`
`21
`
`America’s customers. This covenant not to sue expressly includes any future
`
`22
`
`assignees, licensees, heirs, or successors-in-interest to NantWorks, LLC, Nant
`
`23
`
`Holdings IP, LLC, and to the ’897 Patent. In granting this covenant not to sue,
`
`24
`
`NantWorks does not concede that the ’897 Patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not
`
`25
`
`infringed.
`
`26
`
`9.
`
`Bank of America stipulates that its counterclaims for declaratory
`
`27
`
`judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the ’897 Patent (including Counts XI
`
`28
`
`
`07553-00012/14646061.3
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 292 Filed 01/25/24 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:4834
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`and XII in Bank of America’s Answer to First Amended Complaint, Affirmative
`
`2
`
`Defenses, and Counterclaims) are dismissed with prejudice.
`
`3
`
`10. The Parties agree that each party bears its own fees and costs as to the
`
`4
`
`dismissed claims, but the Parties still have the right to seek attorneys’ fees (e.g., under
`
`5
`
`35 U.S.C. § 285) and costs for the remaining claims in this case upon adjudication of
`
`6
`
`all the remaining claims.
`
`7
`
`11. The Parties agree that, pursuant to Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of
`
`8
`
`Evidence, nothing in this stipulation should be used in this or any future disputes,
`
`9
`
`except for the limited purpose of enforcing the terms of this stipulation.
`
`10
`
`12. The Parties agree that the Court retains jurisdiction over the Parties for
`
`11
`
`the limited purpose of enforcing the terms of this stipulation.
`
`12
`
`For the reasons set forth above, the Parties respectfully request that the Court
`
`13
`
`enter the attached Stipulated Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`07553-00012/14646061.3
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 292 Filed 01/25/24 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:4835
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`By /s/ Eric Huang
`James R. Asperger
`Kevin P.B. Johnson
`Todd M. Briggs
`Eric Huang
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs, NANTWORKS, LLC
`and NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC
`
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`
`
`By: /s/ E. Danielle T. Williams
`George C. Lombardi (pro hac vice)
`E. Danielle T. Williams (pro hac vice)
`Dustin J. Edwards (pro hac vice)
`Diana Hughes Leiden
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and
`BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
`
`
`1
`
`DATED: January 25, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`07553-00012/14646061.3
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 292 Filed 01/25/24 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:4836
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`FILER’S ATTESTATION
`
`I, Eric Huang, am the ECF user whose ID and password were used to file
`
`3
`
`STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to L.R. 5-
`
`4
`
`4.3.4(a)(2), I hereby attest that counsel for Defendants concurred in the filing of this
`
`5
`
`document.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By /s/ Eric Huang
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`07553-00012/14646061.3
`
`
`
`-6-
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`