`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No.
`177129)
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Todd M. Briggs (Bar No. 209282)
`toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, California 94065
`Telephone: (650) 801-5000
`Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`Eric Huang (pro hac vice)
`erichuang@quinnemanuel.com
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`Telephone: (212) 849-7000
`Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`NANTWORKS, LLC and NANT
`HOLDINGS IP, LLC
`
`JS-6
`George C. Lombardi (pro hac vice)
`glombardi@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601-9703
`Telephone: (312) 558-5600
`Facsimile: (312) 558-5700
`
`E. Danielle T. Williams (pro hac vice)
`dwilliams@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`300 South Tryon Street, 16th Floor
`Charlotte, NC 28202
`Telephone: (704) 350-7700
`Facsimile: (704) 350-7800
`
`Michael A. Tomasulo (SBN: 179389)
`mtomasulo@winston.com
`Diana Hughes Leiden (SBN: 267606)
`dhleiden@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 S. Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
`Telephone: (213) 615-1700
`Facsimile: (213) 615-1750
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
`and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
` CASE NO. CV 20-7872-GW-PVCx
`
`ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
`MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
`PREJUDICE
`
`Hon. George H. Wu
`
`
`
`NANTWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company, and NANT
`HOLDINGS IP, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`CORPORATION, a Delaware
`corporation, and BANK OF
`AMERICA, N.A., a national banking
`association,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC
`ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 166 Filed 02/03/22 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:2447
`
`
`
`
`
`Before this Court is the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice of
`Plaintiffs Nantworks, LLC, and Nant Holdings IP, LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or
`“NantWorks”) and Defendants Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America,
`N.A. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Bank of America”) (“NantWorks” and “Bank of
`America” together as the “Parties). The Court, having reviewed the Stipulated
`Motion, and for good cause shown, is of the opinion that the Motion should be
`GRANTED.
`It is therefore ORDERED that NantWorks’s allegations of infringement
`relating to the ’030 Patent (including Count IV of its First Amended Complaint), and
`associated claims for damages, are dismissed with prejudice.
`It is further ORDERED that Bank of America’s counterclaims for declaratory
`judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the ’030 Patent (including Counts
`Seven and Eight in Bank of America’s Answer to First Amended Complaint,
`Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims) are dismissed with prejudice.
`It is further ORDERED that each party bears its own fees and costs as to the
`dismissed claims, but the parties still have the right to seek attorneys’ fees (e.g., under
`35 U.S.C. § 285) and costs for the remaining claims in this case upon adjudication of
`all the remaining claims.
`The Court retains jurisdiction over the Parties to enforce the terms of the
`Stipulated Motion and this Order.
`
`
`
`DATED: February 3, 2022
`
`
`By
`
`
`Honorable George H. Wu
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`Case No. 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC
`ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
